Environmental conditions: definition, indicators, mapping

https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2021-1-27-165-194

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Vladimir S. Tikunov

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Geography Department,
Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;

Sevastopol State University,
ul. Universitetskaya 33, Sevastopol, 299053, Russia;

E-mail: vstikunov@yandex.ru

Tatiana V. Kotova

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Geography Department,
Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: tatianav.kotova@yandex.ru

Stanislav K. Belousov

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Geography Department,
Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: web-town@mail.ru

Abstract

The article provides an overview of existing approaches to assessing the ecological conditions of the environment. An integral assessment of the current ecological conditions with a high level of anthropogenic impact on the environment and the constantly increasing population of the Earth is an important task aimed at determining the strategic path of sustainable development of countries and their regions. Environmental indicators used for this purpose should be representative of environmental conditions and be suitable for regular monitoring at various scale levels.

Ecological conditions is an important factor of the quality of life, the role of which is steadily increasing. The article shows approaches to assessing the quality of life, taking into account environmental conditions of countries and their regions, and provides a variant of integral assessment for Russian cities using state statistics and environmental monitoring data. A study was carried out on the applicability of various indicators to assess the quality of life. Resulted map of the Russian cities quality of life shows the spatial distribution of the quality of life over the territory of Russia.

Keywords

environmental indicators, sustainable development, quality of life.

References

  1. Adriaanse A. Environmental Policy Performance Indicators: A Study on the Development of Indicators for Environmental Policy in the Netherlands, 1993. 175 p.
  2. Alcamo J., Leonard S.A. 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues. UNEP, 2012.
  3. Alekseeva N.N., Milanova E.V. Global ratings and forecasts for assessing the environmental situation in Russia. Local sustainable development, 2017. Electronic resource: http://fsdejournal.ru/node/605 (дата обращения 1.11.2020).
  4. Arustamov E.A. Ratings and criteria for assessing the ecological state of cities and regions of Russia. Online magazine “SCIENCE”. 2017. V. 9. No. 4. Electronic resource: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/41EVN417.pdf (дата обращения 1.11.2020).
  5. Belousova A.P., Semashko L.U. Environmental aspects of sustainable development and indicators that characterize it. Environmental and natural resource issues. Moscow: VINITI, 2004. V. 1. P. 2–20. (in Russian).
  6. Bityukova V.R. Principles and methods of comprehensive assessment of the ecological state of the urban environment. Urbanization problems at the turn of the century. Smolensk: Oykumena, 2002. P. 189–198. (in Russian).
  7. Bobylev S.N. Consideration of the environmental factor in the system of indicators of socio-economic development. Bulletin «On the way to sustainable development of Russia», 2004. V. 29. P. 13–32. (in Russian).
  8. Bobylev S.N. Sustainable development indicators. Regional dimension. Moscow: Acropol, CEPR, 2007. 60 p. (in Russian).
  9. Bulatov V.I., Igenbayeva N.O. Development of environmental indicators of sustainable development at the regional level. Bulletin of Ugra State University. 2008. V. 1 (8). P. 9–16. (in Russian).
  10. Bychkova S.G. Environmental component of sustainable development: systems of indicators used in international statistical practice. GUU Bulletin. 2012. No. 1. P. 10–14. (in Russian).
  11. Chmykhalova S.V., Sibagatullina S.S. Analysis of indicators of the ecological state of the environment (on the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan). Mining information and analytical bulletin. 2018. No. 4. P. 119–127. (in Russian).
  12. Dyakonov K.N. Landscape policy in modern society. Tr. XII Congress of the Russian Geographical Society. Proceedings 1. Saint Petersburg, 2005. P. 105–106. (in Russian).
  13. Elin O.Y. Integral assessment of the ecological state of the territory of the Krasnoyarsk Prichulym region. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University. 2013. No. 3 (25). P. 222–229. (in Russian).
  14. Esty D., Srebotnjak T., Goodall M. The Environmental Sustainability Index, 2005. Электронный ресурс: http://www.yale.edu/esi/ESI2005_Main_Report.pdf (дата обращения 30.03.2020).
  15. Goedkoop M. and Spriensma R. The Eco-Indicator’99. A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report. 3rd Edition, PRé Consultants, Amersfoort. Netherlands, 2001.
  16. Gridin V.G., Chamkina T.I. Indicators of sustainable development and their assessment of the state of the environment of Kuzbass. GIAB, 2007. No. 12. Electronic resource: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pokazateli-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-i-otsenka-s-ih-pomoschyu-sostoyaniya-okruzhayuschey-sredy-kuzbassa (дата обращения 30.10.2020).
  17. Hsu A., Johnson L., Lloyd A. Measuring Progress: A Practical Guide from the Developers of the Environmental Performance Index (EPI). New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, 2013. Электронный ресурс: http://epi.yale.edu (дата обращения 30.07.2020).
  18. Hsu A. et. al. Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale University, 2016. Электронный ресурс: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19868.90249 (дата обращения 10.11. 2019).
  19. Human Ecology: Major Problems. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 212 p. (in Russian).
  20. Latynina Yu.L. New newspaper from 13.10.2019. (in Russian).
  21. Niemi G., McDonald M. Application of Ecological Indicators, Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2004. V. 35. P. 89–111.
  22. Pokrovsky S.G. State of state systems and sustainability of regional development. MSU Bulletin. Ser. Geography. 2001. No. 1. P. 11–14. (in Russian).
  23. Prescott-Allen R. The wellbeing of nations: a country-by-country index of quality of life and the environment. First edition. Publisher: Island Press, 2001. 219 p.
  24. Puolamaa M., Kaplas M., Reinikainen T. Index of Environmental Friendliness. A Metodical Study. Helsinki: Eurostat, 1996.
  25. Segal A.M., Arustamov E.A., Balakin V.A. Assessment of the ecological state of the territory and monitoring of the environment using GIS technologies. Bulletin of Eurasian Science, 2018. No. 2. P. 43. (in Russian).
  26. Tarasova N.P., Kruchina E.B. Indices and indicators of sustainable development. Materials of the international conference “Sustainable Development: Nature–Society–Human”. Moscow, 2006. V. 1. P. 127–144. (in Russian).
  27. Tikunov V.S. Classifications in Geography: Renaissance or Fading? (Experience of formal classifications). Moscow–Smolensk: SGU, 1997. 367 p. (in Russian).
  28. Tikunov V.S., Vatlina T.V. Environmental assessment of territories on the example of municipalities of the Smolensk region. InterCarto. InterGIS. Moscow: MSU Publishing House, 2020. V. 26. No. 1. P. 12–21. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-12-21.
  29. Tishkov A.A. Ensuring the sustainability of the environment. Moscow, 2004. 158 p. (in Russian).
  30. Tsuglenok N.V., Gavrilova O.U., Vasilyev E.P., Ivchenko V.K. Ecological state of the environment from the standpoint of its sustainable development on the territory of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. KrasGAU Bulletin, 2012. No. 5. P. 56–61. (in Russian).
  31. Vaitszekker E., Khargrouz K., Smit M. Factor five. Formula for Sustainable Growth: Report to the Club of Rome. Moscow: AST-PRESSKNIGA, 2013. 68 p. (in Russian).
  32. William E., Levine R. and Roodman D. Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment. American Economic Review. 2004. 94 (3). P. 774–780. DOI: 10.1257/0002828041464560.

For citation: Tikunov V.S., Kotova T.V., Belousov S.K. Environmental conditions: definition, indicators, mapping InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2021. V. 27. Part 1. P. 165–194. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-1-27-165-194 (In Russian)