Geoinformation modeling of the project of eco-geological park in difficult social and environmental conditions of the center of Tyumen

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-629-644

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Anatoly M. Brekhuntsov

LLC BTG,
Nemtsova 22, 625002, Tyumen, Russia;
E-mail: davlin@mnpgeodata.ru

Yuri V. Petrov

University of Tyumen,
Osipenko str., 2, 625002, Tyumen, Russia;
E-mail: y.v.petrov@utmn.ru

Abstract

In the center of the city of Tyumen, there is a valley of the river, unique in its hypsometric characteristics for this natural zone, Tyumenka, which is characterized by complex social and environmental conditions. Today it is characterized by abandonment, degradation of slope natural-territorial complexes, social, historical and archaeological significance for the territorial community of people. All this significantly complicates the development of a mutually acceptable solution for all parties on the arrangement and operation of space. The territory is lands of non-delimited state property, in which scattered land use has developed over the centuries, which requires integrated state management. The authors used the geoinformation modeling method to design an ecogeological park in the Tyumenka river valley. The combination of geoinformation software, information resources of various thematic and temporal divisions (including the use of publicly available Earth remote sensing materials, multi-temporal thematic maps, specialized field surveys and surveys using an unmanned aerial vehicle), spatial development of compromise solutions for all interested parties—all these competitive advantages of geoinformation modeling have made it possible to reach and position comprehensive proposals for the general public. As a result of the study, for the first time, the territory for the initiated creation of an ecogeological park was outlined and functionally delimited. Three zones of promising functional use of the Tyumenka River valley in the format of an eco-geological park have been identified: historical-archaeological, geological and landscape-ecological. Each of the designated areas received its own territorial representation, argued by the current characteristics of the landscape, the social and environmental demands of the society, and the technological requirements for the placement of the relevant engineering facilities. The spatial placement of objects based on geoinformation modeling is presented. Heterogeneous, multitemporal data are systematized within the framework of one project, which made it possible to take into account various constraints. In the conditions of work with sites characterized by a situation of abandonment in the center of Tyumen, which is unique for Tyumen, and high social tension, the use of geoinformation modeling made it possible to obtain clear and verified spatial proposals.

Keywords

ecogeological park, Tyumenka, geoinformation modeling, functional zoning

References

  1. Belich I.V. Drawing of Tyumen at the turn of the XVII–XVIII centuries. and topography of the “Tsar’s Settlement” (Chimgi/Tsymgi-tury). Bulletin of Archeology, Anthropology and Ethnography, 2009. No. 11. P. 143–163. (in Russian).
  2. Borisenko A.Yu. Defensive structures of turkspeakers population in Western and Southern Siberia according to the Western Europeans in second half XVII–first half XVIII centuries. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2013. Vol. 12. No. 7. P. 57–63. (in Russian).
  3. Borodkin L.I., Rumyantsev M.V., Lapteva M.A. All-Russian Scientific and Methodological Workshop the Virtual Reconstruction of the Objects of Historical and Cultural Heritage in the Format of the Scientific Research and Educational Process. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2011. Vol. 4. No. 7. P. 1039–1044.
  4. Bukhvalova A.Y., Klukina A.I. The History of Urban Development of Tyumen and Contemporary Issues of Preserving the Historical City Plan. Balandinsky Readings, 2018. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 394–400 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/9999-001А-2018-10060.
  5. Cannon Ivers B. Navy Yard Central Green. Stading Urban Landscapes. 2018. Birkhaeuser. P. 208. DOI: 10.1515/9783035610468-208.
  6. Carsjens G.J., van der Knaap W. Strategic land-use allocation: dealing with spatial relationships and fragmentation of agriculture. Landscape and urban planning, 2002. No. 58 (2–4). P. 171–179.
  7. Chebotarev G.N. Mutually responsible partnership of state and society. State and Law, 2019. No. 10. P. 26–34. (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007182-2.
  8. Gurev N.E., Elizarov O.I., Petrov Yu.V. The concept of creating a natural park in Tyumen. Geopolitics and ecogeodynamics of regions. 2021. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 217–225. (in Russian).
  9. Kalioujnaia I.J., Carsjens G.J., Vorobyova T.A., Kalioujnaia N.S. Supporting Regional Nature Park management in Russia. InterCarto. InterGIS. Proceedings of the International conference. Ghent, 2009. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 83–96.
  10. Kalioujnaia I.J., Kalioujnaia N.S., Leummens H.J.L. Experience of using cartographic methods and GIS in the design of biosphere reserve “Elton”. InterCarto. InterGIS, 2019. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 337–351 (in Russian). DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2019-1-25-337-351.
  11. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V. Intraregional Population Migration in Russia: Suburbs Outperform Capitals. Regional Research of Russia, 2021. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 24–38. (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2587556621010076.
  12. Kochurov B.I., Khaziakhmetova Yu.A., Ivashkina I.V., Sukmanova E.A. Landscape Approach in city-planning. South of Russia: ecology, development, 2018. Vol. 13 No. 3. P. 71–82 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2018-3-71-82.
  13. Mankova I.L. The Orthodox landscape of Tyumen in the XVII–the first half of the XVIII century: the experience of “reading”. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2015. Vol. 14. No. 8. P. 58–68. (in Russian).
  14. Matvejev A.V., Tataurov S.F. Capitals, roads and boundaries between the Siberian Khanates. Ural historical journal, 2011. No. 2. P. 106–115. (in Russian).
  15. Matveeva N.P. Final report on rescue archaeological excavations on the territory of the protected cultural layer of the city of Tyumen, the block of F. Engels-Communy streets (Tsarevo settlement) in 2011. Tyumen: Archive of the Research Laboratory of Archeology and Ethnography of the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities UoT, 2012. No. 324. 173 p. (in Russian).
  16. Mihailov V., Runge J. Identification of Individual. Territorial Communities and Social Space: An Attempt of Conceptualization. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2019. No. 1. P. 52–62. (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003747-4.
  17. Preobrazhenskiy Yu.V. Economic-geographical and network position of the largest russian cities in the postsoviet period. Geographical bulletin, 2020. No. 1 (52). P. 84–95. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17072/2079-7877-2020-1-84-95.
  18. Rafikova T.N., Chikunova I.Yu. Economy of a medieval population of the Forest Steppe and Sub-Taiga Trans Urals. Vestnik arheologii, antropologii i etnografii, 2012. No. 4. P. 81–90. (in Russian).
  19. Rafikova T.N. Report on rescue archaeological excavations on the territory of the protected cultural layer in the city of Tyumen (Tsarevo settlement) and archaeological exploration in the Tyumen district of the Tyumen region. Tyumen: Archive of the Research Laboratory of Archeology and Ethnography of the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities UoT, 2008. No. 1/119. 120 p. (in Russian).
  20. Rafikova T.N. Report on rescue archaeological excavations on the territory of the protected cultural layer in the city of Tyumen (Tsarevo settlement) in 2008. Tyumen: Archive of the Research Laboratory of Archeology and Ethnography of the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities UoT, 2009. No. 1/201. 202 p. (in Russian).
  21. Rafikova T.N. Report on rescue archaeological excavations on the territory of the protected cultural layer in the city of Tyumen (Tsarevo settlement) in 2009. Tyumen: Archive of the Research Laboratory of Archeology and Ethnography of the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities UoT, 2010. No. 1/284. 203 p. (in Russian).
  22. Rafikova T.N. The results of the study of the Tsar’s settlement. Archaeological discoveries, 2010. Vol. 2007. P. 512–513. (in Russian).
  23. Spens M. Deep Explorations Into Site/Non-Site: The Work of Gustafson Porter. Architectural Design. 2007. No. 77. P. 66–75. DOI: 10.1002/ad.426.
  24. Vershinina I.A., Kurbanov A.R. Zoospace Transformation of Modern Cities and the Possibility of their Use in the Environmental Education of the Population. Ecology and Industry of Russia, 2017. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 50–55. (in Russian). DOI: 10.18412/1816-0395-2017-1-50-55.

For citation: Brekhuntsov A.M., Petrov Yu.V. Geoinformation modeling of the project of eco-geological park in difficult social and environmental conditions of the center of Tyumen. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2022. V. 28. Part 1. P. 629–644. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-629-644 (in Russian)