Visual characteristics of landscapes and methods for their assessment on GIS (Belogradchik rocks (Bulgaria) as an example)

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-2-27-191-204

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Elina A. Sheremet

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography,
Leninskie gory 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: elina7-sheremet@mail.ru

Natalia N. Kalutskova

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography,
Leninskie gory 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: kalutskova@gmail.com

Vladimir S. Dekhnich

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography,
Leninskie gory 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: vodo.ast@gmail.com

Abstract

Visual characteristics of landscapes are important factors for the assessment of tourist and recreational potential of territories. At present, a number of methodological approaches are applied to assess the visual characteristics of landscapes. They can be divided into traditional, associated exclusively with field research, and innovative, which is based on remote sensing data (RSD) of high spatial resolution and GIS technologies. Field assessment of the visual quality of landscapes utilizes a system of numerous elementary indicators to minimize subjectivity of assessment. They are conducted within separate areas or touristic routes. In its turn, modern GIS and high quality of remote sensing data allow assessing of most indicators of the visual quality of landscapes for any observation point on the entire territory. The main task of our research is to verify the results of automated processing of ultra-high resolution aerial photographs obtained from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) by field observations on a touristic route. The research was carried out on the territory of the “Belogradchik Rocks” Geopark (North-West Bulgaria). In our study, we estimated 4 out of 28 aesthetic indicators—the amount of mountain peaks visible from a site, the amount of mountain peaks on the skyline, the percentage of the forest-covered area, and the amount of open spaces in the wooded landscape. The obtained results confirmed that our approach allows calculating these aesthetic indicators at an accuracy level comparable to field observations.

Keywords

visual characteristics of landscapes, landscape aesthetics, GIS technologies, unmanned aerial vehicles, Belogradchik Rocks (Bulgaria)

References

  1. Atkina L.I. Landscape aesthetics: tutorial. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Forestry University, 2017. 74 p. (in Russian).
  2. Bibaeva A.Yu., Makarov A.A. Application of Information Systems for Calculations of Indicators of Aesthetic Assessment of Landscapes. The Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Earth Science series, 2018. V. 24. P. 17–33. DOI: 10.26516/2073-3402.2018.24.17 (in Russian).
  3. Birkhoff G. Aesthetic measure. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1933. 292 p.
  4. Bredikhin A.V. Aesthetic assessment of the relief in recreational geomorphological research. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5. Geography, 2005. No. 3. P. 7–13 (in Russian).
  5. Cwiakala P., Kocierz R., Puniach E., Nedzka M., Mamczarz K., Niewiem W., Wiacek P. Assessment of the possibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for the documentation of hiking trails in Alpine areas. MDPI International Journal, 2017. V. 18. Iss. 1. P. 1–28. DOI: 10.3390/s18010081.
  6. Dirin D.A. Assessment and recreational use of landscape and aesthetic resources of the Ust-Koksinsky district of the Altai Republic. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2007. 206 p. (in Russian).
  7. Dirin D.A., Popov E.S. Assessment of landscape and aesthetic attractiveness of landscapes: methodological review. News of the Altai state University, 2010. No. 3. P. 120 ̶124 (in Russian).
  8. Eringis K.I., Budryunas A.-R.A. The essence and methodology of a detailed ecological and aesthetic study of landscapes. Ecology and aesthetics of the landscape. Vilnius: Mintis, 1975, P. 107–160 (in Russian).
  9. Filin V.A. Videoecology: what is good for the eye, and what is bad. Moscow: Videoecology, 2006. 512 p. (in Russian).
  10. Gibson J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Moscow: Progress, 1988. 464 p. (in Russian).
  11. Gobster P.H. An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Journal, 1999. No. 18 (1). P. 54–64.
  12. Gold J. Psychology and Geography: Foundations of Behavioural Geography. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 304 p. (in Russian).
  13. Hackney C., Clayton A. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and their application in geomorphic mapping. Geomorphological Techniques, 2015. Chap. 1. Sec. 1.7. P. 1–12.
  14. Hettner A. Geography. Her history, essence and methods. Moscow; Leningrad: State Publishing House, 1930. 416 p.
  15. Humboldt A. Pictures of nature. Moscow: Geografgiz, 1959. 270 p.
  16. Kalutskova N.N., Safonova A.A., Smorzhok M.A. Assessment of the natural attractiveness of the tourist routes of the Belogradchik rocks (Bulgaria). Forest ecosystems and urbanization. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2008. P. 219–225 (in Russian).
  17. Kalutskova N.N., Sinovski D., Dronin N.M., Sinovska D., Sheremet E.A. Experience of nomination of geological parks into the UNESCO global network. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Natural Sciences, 2019. No. 2. P. 80–93. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7189-2019-2-80-93 (in Russian).
  18. Kochurov B.I., Buchatskaya N.V. Assessment of aesthetic potential of the landscape. South of Russia: ecology, development, 2007. V. 2. No. 4. P. 25–34. DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2007-4-25-34 (in Russian).
  19. Nikolaev V.A. Landscape Science: Aesthetics and Design. Moscow: Aspect Press Publishing House, 2005. 176 p. (in Russian).
  20. Norberg-Schultz C. Life takes place. News of higher educational institutions. Architecton, 1995. No. 1–2. P. 24–31. (in Russian).
  21. Rotanova I.N., Vasilyeva O.A. Aesthetic attractiveness assessment of the natural park “Foothills of the Altai” landscapes with use geoinformation technologies. Journal Science and Tourism: Interaction Strategies. Barnaul: Altai University Publishing House, 2017. V. 7 (5). P. 29–36 (in Russian).
  22. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky V.P. Region and country. Moscow; Leningrad: State Publishing House, 1928. 311 p. (in Russian).
  23. Shaoyu L., Weijie D., Yongbo Y. Application of UAV oblique photograph modeling technology in mountain tourism planning. 3rd International Symposium on EEEMS. Francis Academic Press, 2018. P. 240–245.
  24. Sheremet E.A., Dekhnich V.S., Kalutskova N.N. Perspectives of GIS-technology application for visual evaluation of landscapes for organization of geopark. Bulletin of the Russian Geographical Society, 2020. V. 152. No. 6. P. 69–78. DOI: 10.31857/S0869607120060063.
  25. Shiou Y., Chengju D., Zhihui C., Hao W., Kailang G., Yirong L., Yongjie C., Wenyan L., Qiang F., Wenbo L. Assessing safety and suitability of old trails for hiking using ground and drone surveys. International Journal Geo-Informational, 2020. V. 9. Iss. 4. P. 1–17.
  26. Tronkov D. Belogradchik Rock Sculptures—a child of erosional power of nature and of geological controls. Geologica Balc., 1998. V. 3 (4). No. 28. P. 153–158.
  27. Tronkov D., Sinnyovsky D. Belogradchik rocks in Bulgaria—geological setting, genesis and geoconservation value. Geoheritage, 2012. V. 4. No. 3. P. 153–164.

For citation: Sheremet E.A., Kalutskova N.N., Dekhnich V.S. Visual characteristics of landscapes and methods for their assessment on GIS (Belogradchik rocks (Bulgaria) as an example). InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2021. V. 27. Part 2. P. 191–204. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-2-27-191-204 (in Russian)