Assessment of sustainable development of the coastal zone of the Sea of Azov (Russian sector) based on an integral approach

https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2021-1-27-99-111

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Olga E. Arkhipova

Federal Research Center Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Chekhov Avenue, 41, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia;
E-mail: arkhipova@ssc-ras.ru

Southern Federal University,
st. B. Sadovaya, 105/42, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia;
E-mail: arkhipova@sfedu.ru

Elena A. Chernogubova

Federal Research Center Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Chekhov Avenue, 41, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia;

Tamara T. Tarasova

Federal Research Center Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Chekhov Avenue, 41, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia;

Karine E. Arkhipova

Federal Research Center Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Chekhov Avenue, 41, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia;
E-mail: arkhipova@ssc-ras.ru

Southern Federal University,
st. B. Sadovaya, 105/42, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia;
E-mail: arkhipova@sfedu.ru

Abstract

Identification of patterns of formation of regional environmental and socio-economic problems in the system “society–nature” and on this basis—to ensure public safety and minimize the economic damage social infrastructure are the main objectives of the study. The object of research is the coastal zone of the Sea of Azov (Russian sector)

The subject of the research is a comprehensive analysis of the factors of sustainable development of the coastal zones of the Azov Sea region (Russian sector) based on an integral approach. The paper considers methods for constructing a comprehensive risk analysis model for the coastal zones of the Azov Sea region (Russian sector), which should consider various influencing factors of coastal risks at the same time.

The analysis of the main indicators of medical, social, and demographic processes in the selected reference areas of the Rostov region and the Krasnodar Territory of the coastal zone of the Azov Sea is carried out. A comparative assessment of the economic stability of the municipal districts of the Rostov region and the Krasnodar Territory has been carried out. The work used the software ArcGIS Pro (methods of multi-criteria spatial statistics), the DECERNS MCDA DE module (including a set of tools for multi-criteria analysis of decision-making). The study also used the ArcGIS multicriteria statistics similarity method, which relies on statistical tools to analyze the distribution of data and identify patterns (trends).

The novelty of the proposed research is the application of the theory of complex risk analysis to analyze the sustainable development of the coastal zone and the choice of indicators that are key for this territory. The theoretical novelty of the research lies in the use of an interdisciplinary approach and a set of complementary methods from various sciences.

Keywords

Arkhipova O.E., Tarasova T.T. Assessment of the demographic state of the coastal zone of the Sea of Azov with the use of geoinformation technologies. Science of the South of Russia. 2020. V. 16. No. 2. P. 51–62. DOI: 10.7868/S25000640200206. (in Russian)..

References

  1. Arkhipova O.E., Chernogubova E.A., Tarasova T.T. Analysis of medico-ecological and socio-demographic factors in the development of the coastal zone of the Sea of Azov. InterCarto. InterGIS. 2020. V. 26. No. 3. P. 105–123. https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2020-3-26-105-123. (in Russian).
  2. Bush D.M., Neal W.J., Young R.S., Pilkey O.H. Utilization of geo-indicators for rapid assessment of coastal-hazard risk and mitigation. Ocean and Coastal Management. 1999. No. 42. P. 647–670.
  3. Carrasco A.R., Ferreira Ó., Matias A., Freire P. Flood hazard assessment and management of fetch-limited coastal environments. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2012. No. 65. P. 15–25.
  4. Dabiev D.F., Dabieva U.M. Assessment of the transport infrastructure of the macroregions of Russia. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2015. No. 11. P. 289–284. (in Russian).
  5. Demidovskiy A.V. Comparative analysis of multicriteria decision making methods: ELECTRE, TOPSIS and ML-LDM. XXIII International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM-2020). Collection of reports. Saint Petersburg: SPbGETU “LETI”, 2020. P. 234–237. (in Russian).
  6. Glinsky V.V., Serga L.K., Bulkina A.M. Differentiation of municipalities as a factor of economic development of territories. Questions of statistics. 2016. No. 8. P. 46–52. (in Russian).
  7. Gogoberidze G.G., Arakelov M.S., Mavridi K.P., Arakelov A.S. Methodology of socio-economic zoning of territorial objects of the Krasnodar Black Sea region. Regional economy: theory and practice. 2013. No. 15. P. 2–8. (in Russian).
  8. Hwang Ching-Lai, Kwangsun Yoon Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making. 1981. P. 58–191.
  9. Navas J.M., Telfer T.C., Ross L.G. Separability indexes and accuracy of neurofuzzy classification in geographic information systems for assessment of coastal environmental vulnerability. Ecological Informatics. 2012. No. 12. P. 43–49.
  10. Mesropyan K.E. Analytical support of the strategic planning system: a methodology for assessing the comparative efficiency of the economy of the regions of the Southern Federal District. Regional Economy. South of Russia. 2014. No. 1. P. 126–133. (in Russian).
  11. Ozturk D., Batuk F. Implementation of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis with VB in ArcGIS. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 2011. V. 10. No. 06. P. 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004695.
  12. Selyutin V.V., Zarutskiy S.A., Mesropyan K.E. Hybrid technology of integral assessment of the effectiveness of regional systems (on the example of cities in the South of Russia). Information technologies in education. 2012. No. 13. P. 163–170. (in Russian).
  13. Tikunov V.S., Chereshnya O.Yu. Regional assessment of economic development. InterСarto. InterGIS. 2018. V. 24. No. 1. P. 44–53. (in Russian).
  14. Tsydypova E.S. Criteria for sustainable development of the region. Science yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2016. No. 2 (2). P. 125–131. (in Russian).
  15. Wong K.T.M., Lee J.H.W., Harrison P.J. Forecasting of environmental risk maps of coastal algal blooms. Harmful Algae. 2009. V. 8. P. 407–420.
  16. Yasuhara K., Komine H., Murakami S., Chen G., Mitani Y., Duc D.M. Effects of climate change on geo-disasters in coastal zones and their adaptation. Geotext. Geomemb. 2012. No. 30. P. 24–34.
  17. Yusupov K.N., Yangirov A.V., Timiryanova V.M., Toktamysheva Yu.S. Assessment of the influence of territorial location on the development of municipalities. Economy of the region. 2019. No. 3. P. 851–864. DOI: 10.1142/S0219622011004695. (in Russian).

For citation: Arkhipova O.E., Chernogubova E.A., Tarasova T.T., Arkhipova K.E. Assessment of sustainable development of the coastal zone of the Sea of Azov (Russian sector) based on an integral approach InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2021. V. 27. Part 1. P. 99–111. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-1-27-99-111 (In Russian)