Transformation of the oikonyms of the Republic of Tajikistan: analysis and mapping

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-320-328

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Tatiana I. Gerasimenko

Orenburg State University, Faculty of Geology and Geography,
Pobedy Ave, 13, 460018, Orenburg, Russia,
E-mail: tanyag26@yandex.ru

Natalia U. Sviatokha

Orenburg State University, Faculty of Geology and Geography,
Pobedy Ave, 13, 460018, Orenburg, Russia,
E-mail: osugeo@yandex.ru

Abstract

Toponymy of different epochs on the map of Tajikistan, as well as other complex ethno-cultural regions, coexists. It is explained by the dynamics of the ethnic composition of the population for millennia. Toponymy in a certain extent reflects the historical and geographical specifics of the region. Several toponymic layers are highlighted on the map of the republic. The “Soviet” layer reflects the processes of unification that were prevailing during this period of time throughout the entire Soviet space. As part of the project, supported by a grant from the Russian Geographical Society, it is planned to create a series of maps showing the change in toponymy in the post-Soviet space. The purpose of this stage of the study was to analyze the transformation of the oikonyms of the level of district centers throughout the 20th–21st centuries, and especially in the post-Soviet period. The scale of renaming is much wider and applies to oronyms, hydronyms and other toponyms. In the framework of the historical and geographical approach, we used a system of methods to identify transformation trends: comparison of multi-temporal maps, statistical, geoinformation. We have created a database based on an analysis of the dynamics of the oikonymy of sixty-five settlements of Tajikistan over the period of the 20th–21st centuries.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union the processes of regionalization and transformation of the cultural and geographical space intensified and accelerated on the territory of the newly formed sovereign states. One of the indicators of these processes became a large-scale tendency to rename the names of geographical objects. In the Republic of Tajikistan, the renaming of districts, cities, rural settlements and individual objects is carried out in the several directions. They are: a replacement of “Soviet” (for the most part Russian) names, renaming some Turkic (Uzbek) place names, and renaming also some place names in Tajik. Most of the renamed settlements received historical names or the names of figures of Tajik history and culture.

An analysis of the processes of change, in particular, desovetization, derusification, deturization and transformation of traditional Tajik toponyms, revealed the need to fix the current and lost toponymic system of Tajikistan, as well as other post-Soviet countries.

Keywords

cartographic method, toponymy, Republic of Tajikistan, cultural-geographical space, transformation

References

  1. Countries and peoples: popular science geographic and ethnographic publication. T. 19. The Soviet Union. Republic of Transcaucasia. Republic of Central Asia. Kazakhstan. Moscow: Mysl’, 1984. 380 p. (in Russian).
  2. Gafurov B.G. Tajiks: The most ancient, ancient and medieval history. USSR Academy of Sciences. Institute of Oriental Studies. Moscow: Nauka, 1972. 658 p. (in Russian).
  3. Gerasimenko T.I. The influence of the new state border on the development of ethnocultural space (an example of the Orenburg-Kazakhstan border). Science. Innovations. Technologies, 2014. No 4. P. 109–121 (in Russian).
  4. Gerasimenko T.I., Sviatokha N.Yu. Toponymic transformation of the Republic of Tajikistan. Regional problems of geology, geography, technosphere and environmental safety, 2019. P. 102–105 (in Russian).
  5. History of the Ancient East: From state formations to ancient empires. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura (Oriental Literature), 2004. 895 p. (in Russian).
  6. Kagansky V.L. Soviet space: construction, destruction, transformation (structural and geographical analysis). Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 1995. No 2. P. 25–39 (in Russian).
  7. Kalutskov V.N. Conceptualization of geographical space: onomastic aspects. Herald of Moscow University. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2020. No 1. P. 57–69 (in Russian).
  8. Kalutskov V.N. Cultural and geographical zoning of the Near Abroad. Current spatial development trends and priorities of social geography: materials of an international scientific conference in the framework of the IX annual scientific assembly of Russian geographers-social scientists. Barnaul: IP Kolmogorov I.A., 2018. V. 1. P. 71–76 (in Russian).
  9. Khromov A.L. Essays on toponymy and microtoponymy of Tajikistan. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1975. 85 p. (in Russian).
  10. Peoples of the World: Historical and ethnographic reference book Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1988. 624 p. (in Russian).

For citation: Gerasimenko T.I., Sviatokha N.U. Transformation of the oikonyms of the Republic of Tajikistan: analysis and mapping. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020. V. 26. Part 4. P. 320–328. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-320-328 (in Russian)