Atlas mapping of the Baikal region: structural-semiotic organization

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-385-399

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Aleksandr R. Batuev

V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS,
Ulan Batorskaya str., 1, 664033, Irkutsk, Russia;
E-mail: arbatuev.irk@yandex.ru

Dashi A. Batuev

V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS,
Ulan Batorskaya str., 1, 664033, Irkutsk, Russia;
E-mail: dbatuevuseful@yandex.ru

Andrey N. Beshentsev

The Baikal Institute of Nature Management SB RAS,
Sakhyanova str., 6, 670047, Irkutsk, Russia;
E-mail: abesh@mail.ru

Leonid M. Korytniy

V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS,
Ulan Batorskaya str., 1, 664033, Irkutsk, Russia;
E-mail: kor@irigs.irk.ru

Abstract

We consider the process of forming the iconic system of atlas mapping of the Baikal region. More than twenty atlases were created for the territory of the Baikal region and published. Fifteen of these were selected by us for their general cartosemiotic study. We review the results of the analysis of the information-modular structure of atlases on the example of the map index in these atlases. It is shown that the number of information-semiotic modules in each atlas can vary and depends on its subject and purpose. The subject, structure and purpose of atlases are the cause of their complex and flexible modular-thematic semiotic structure. The analysis of the internal semiotic structure of atlases was carried out from the perspective of a single system of classification of conventional signs and graphic display methods on the example of three atlases: Atlas of Transbaikalia, Atlas of the Baikal Basin and the new atlas “Baikal region: society and nature”. The information and semiotic modules of the new atlas are formed according to the macrostructure of its thematic content, taking into account territorial levels and specific substantive thematic positions of mapping. When creating this atlas, we used effective methods of semiotic modeling and a certain balance and variety of applied syntactic constructions of cartographic signs. The atlas is being prepared for a printing publication as a work of a new kind, integrating modern information about the impact of socio-economic processes on the natural environment. The balance and diversity in the combination of various types, classes, groups and types of syntactic constructions of cartographic signs revealed during semiotic analysis of atlases of the Baikal region shows a high scientific level of map compilation and works on the general semiotic design of the publication of most atlases of the Baikal region.

Keywords

Baikal region, atlas, structural-semiotic organization, cartosemiotic models, syntactic classification of cartographic signs

References

  1. Aslanikashvili A.F. Metacartography. Main problems. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1974. 128 p. (in Russian).
  2. Atlas of Transbaikalia (Buryat Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic and the Chita region). Moscow — Irkutsk: GUGK, 1967. 176 p. (in Russian).
  3. Atlas of the Irkutsk region. Moscow — Irkutsk: GUGK, 1962. 182 p. (in Russian).
  4. Atlas mapping: traditions and innovations. Proceedings of the Xth Scientific conference on thematic cartography, Irkutsk, October 22–24, 2015. Irkutsk: Publishing House of the Institute of Geography named after V.B. Sochava of the SB RAS, 2015. 228 p. (in Russian).
  5. Batuev A.R., Beshentsev A.N., Bogdanov V.N., Dorzhgotov D., Korytny L.M., Plyusnin V.M. The ecological Atlas of the Baikal basin: a cartographic innovation. Geography and Natural Resources, 2015. No 1. P. 5–17 (in Russian).
  6. Batuev A.R., Korytny L.M. Multilevel Atlas ecological mapping (on the example of the Baikal region). Geography and Natural Resources, 2018. No 4. P. 26–37 (in Russian).
  7. Batuev D.A., Vologzhina S.Zh., Sakyaeva M.G. Cartographic models of nature use of the region. Irkutsk: Publishing House of ISU, 2013. 161 p. (in Russian).
  8. Berlyant A.M. Geosemiotics and visualization of geoimages. Informational Bulletin of GIS-Association. Moscow, 2002. P. 27–29 (in Russian).
  9. Lyuty A.A. Map language: essence, system, functions. Ed. 2nd, correct. Moscow: IG RAS, 2002. 327 p. (in Russian).
  10. Salishchev K.A. National and regional atlases (principles and perspectives). Ways of cartography development. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 1975. P. 197–209 (in Russian).
  11. Tikunov B.C., Yanvaryova L.F. Ecological and geographical mapping: concepts, methods, technology. Geography and Natural Resources, 1995. No 4. P. 10–18 (in Russian).
  12. Volodchenko A. Atlas cartosemiotics. Dresden: Selbstverl. der Technischen Univ. Dresden, 2006. 99 p. (in Russian).
  13. Volodchenko A.S., Golubchikov Yu.N., Eremchenko E.N. About the synthesis of neogeography and metacartosemiotics. über die synthese der neogeographie und metakartosemiotik. Geocontext: Scientific Multimedia Almanac, 2014. No 2. P. 48–60.
  14. Volodchenko A., Rotanova I.N. Information-modular aspect of cartosemiotic analysis of ecological atlases. InterCarto. InterGIS. GIS for sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. St. Petersburg, 2002. V. 8. P. 315–318 (in Russian).
  15. Vorobyov V.V., Vasiliev S.N., Antipov A.N., Pochtarenko M.V., Ruzhnikov G.M. et al. Integrated information and cartographic support of sustainable development of the Baikal region. Geography and Natural Resources, 1995. No 1. P. 5–15 (in Russian).

For citation: Batuev A.R., Batuev D.A., Beshentsev A.N., Korytniy L.M. Atlas mapping of the Baikal region: structural-semiotic organization. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020. V. 26. Part 1. P. 385–399. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-385-399 (in Russian)