Global cities and big businesses: contours of partnership for sustainable development

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-167-180

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Nikolay A. Sluka

Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Faculty of Geography, Department of Geography of World Economy;
Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: sluka2011@yandex.ru

Vakhtang R. Partsvaniya

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute for Social Sciences, School of Public Policy and Management;
Vernadskogo Ave, 82/1, 119571, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: partsvaniya-vr@ranepa.ru

Abstract

The article reveals the permanent expansion in the number of actors aimed at proper solution of the sustainable development goals, among which the largest TNCs with huge material, financial, human and other resources play a special role. The increased territorial concentration of the structures of transnational businesses gives particular weight in the global economy to individual cities that have received the name of global centers, whereas their openness to partnership with municipal authorities provides a serious foundation for sustainable development. The growing importance of studying cities in the context of globalization and the active branching of large businesses is emphasized not so much as hubs for home-based TNCs, but as localization areas for divisions of largest corporations from other countries. The scale of the presence of foreign companies in the US global cities is revealed, the main features of the industry composition and geographical structure of these companies in the country’s agglomerations are reasoned and visualized.

The ambiguity of the modern approach of TNCs in supporting cities sustainable development goals is considered. Sustainability agenda is significant for the success and business reputation of companies but often perceived as a source of financial costs. Based on an analysis of the data of The US Cities Sustainable Development Goals Report, the Forbes 2000 ranking and the official websites of leading TNCs, a number of methods are used to test the hypothesis on the degree and nature of the impact of big businesses, represented by home-based TNCs and branches of foreign companies, on sustainability of the US global cities. It has been determined that global cities have a number of common problems and have not yet achieved sustainable development goals; there is no direct correlation between the success of their implementation and the status of cities in the global ranking, and both local and foreign businesses take a very modest part in this process. A radical and massive change in business strategies can provide a breakthrough in sustainable development of cities and the country.

Keywords

sustainable development, economic development, big businesses, branches of foreign TNCs, global cities

References

  1. Blagov Yu.E., Kabalina V.I., Petrova-Savchenko A.A., Sobolev I.S. Creating value for business and society: analysis of corporate social activities of the Russian companies. Russian Journal of Management, 2015. No 13 (2). Р. 67–98 (in Russian).
  2. Bohnsack R., Pinkse J., Kolk A. Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 2014. No 43 (2). P. 284–300.
  3. Carroll A.B., Shabana K.M. The business case for corporate responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010. No 12 (1). P. 85–105.
  4. City in the context of global processes. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2011. 448 p. (in Russian).
  5. Csomós G. Cities as command and control centres of the world economy: An empirical analysis, 2006–2015. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 2017. No 38. P. 7–26.
  6. Eccles R., Ioannou I., Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 2014. No 60 (11). P. 2835–2857.
  7. Friedmann J. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 1986. No 17 (1). P. 69–84.
  8. Global urban analysis: A survey of cities in globalization. London: Earthscan, 2011. 464 p.
  9. Hall P. Globalization and world cities. Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 1998. P. 17–36.
  10. Kavlak G., Mc Nerney J., Trancik J.E. Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaic modules. Energy policy, 2018. No 123. P. 700–710.
  11. Kolk A. The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 2016. No 51 (1). P. 23–34.
  12. Laudal T. Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 2011. No 7 (2). P. 234–256.
  13. Newman P. The rise and rise of renewable cities. Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability, 2017. V. 2. No 10. Web resource: https://www.rees-journal.org/articles/rees/pdf/2017/01/rees170008s.pdf (accessed 18.08.2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/rees/2017008.
  14. Partsvaniya V.R., Sluka N.A. Business in the context of sustainable development: novation and approaches of Scania. Logistics, 2019. No 8. P. 12–17 (in Russian).
  15. Pil’ka M.E., Sluka N.A. US global cities as hubs of foreign multinational corporations. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2017. V. 6 (57). P. 196–206 (in Russian).
  16. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. Creating shared value. Managing Sustainable Business. Dordrecht: Springer, 2019. P. 323–346.
  17. Sassen S. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1991. 412 p.
  18. Taylor P.J. World city network: A global urban analysis. Routledge, 2004. 256 p.
  19. The 2019 US cities sustainable development report. The sustainable development solutions network United States (SDSN USA). 2019. 52 p.

For citation: Sluka N.A., Partsvaniya V.R. Global cities and big businesses: contours of partnership for sustainable development. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020. V. 26. Part 1. P. 167–180. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-167-180 (in Russian)