Approach to elaboration of integral indicators for assessment of spatial objects characterisics and analyses of typical errors (on the base of sustainable development indicators and Russian regions as an example)

http://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2019-1-25-5-17

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Author

Ivan N. Rubanov

Lomonosov Moscow State University,
Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia
E-mail: rubanovin@yandex.ru

Abstract

Integral indicators (further—II) in geography is a measurement composed of many simple indicators to characterize complex properties of spatial phenomenon. II is subjective, since a scientist should make personal decision to choose approach, the way of mathematic processing and integration of initial data to compos II. Composing II consists of a few stages: definition of the object and the focus of the research; definition of territorial units—their scale and boundaries; selection of particular indicators and their initial structuring (gathering in subgroups); normalizing indicators using threshes; defining weights of particular indicators and algorithm of their integration for II calculation. Verification of results could be done using comparison of calculated and real values in well-known field plots. If it is impossible then cartographic visualization is used—chaotic mix of areas with different II values which resemble patchwork quilt is a witness of mistakes in methodology and selected approach. Typical errors while composing II are: the object and the focus of the research are not defined; dimensionality of indicators is wrong; irrelevant indicators is used; failed approach to definition the scale or type of territorial units; irrelevant approach to definition of threshes or inaccurate expert definition of threshes, in particular incorrect application of minimal and maximum values in dataset as low/high threshes. When aspects of sustainable development are investigated and in many other cases pressure, state, reaction and management indicators incorrectly mixed and used together. When territory of Russia is in focus typical errors are: using regions as basic territorial unit (higher administrative division level) instead of natural areas or lower level division, incorrect statistic data deriving for multi-unit regions, mixing divergent socio-economic indicators and also—using unreliable (for some regions) statistical indicators.

Keywords

integral indicators, GIS, cartography, sustainable development, Russia.

References

  1. Crime in Russia. Attorney General’s Office of Russian Federation. Moscow, 2017. P. 52 (in Russian).
  2. Human Development Report 2016. UNDP, New York, 2017. P. 273.
  3. Human Development Report for Russia 2016. Еd. by S. Bobylev, L. Grigorieva. M.: Russian Government Administration Analysis Center, 2016. 298 p. (in Russian).
  4. Indicators of Sustainable Development. Tumen, IPOS SO RAN, 2000 (in Russian, translation from English of Indicators of Sustainable Development, UN Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development, December 1994).
  5. Orlov D. Ranking of Administration effectiveness of Russia Regions in 2015, 2016. Web resource: http://www.apecom.ru/projects/item.php?ELEMENT_ID=2362&SECTION_ID=91 (accessed 03.03.2017) (in Russian).
  6. Ranking of Social and Economic Development of Russian Regions. 2017 Summary. Moscow, 2018. LLC “Rating Agency RIA Rating”. Web resource: http://vid1.rian.ru/ig/ratings/ rating_regions_2018.pdf (accessed 05.04.2018) (in Russian).
  7. Report on the aggregation of Indicators for Sustainable Development. CSD, NY, 2001. (UN Department for Economic and Social Affairs. Division for Sustainable Development (http://www.un.org/esa/) Indicators of Sustainable Development. CSD, NY, 2001.
  8. Rubanov I. Sustainability Index Calculation for Russian Regions. Scientific collection “Regional Bulletin of the East”, 2014. No 2 (62). P. 58–69 (in Russian).
  9. Rubanov I.N., Tikunov V.S. Evaluation of the economic sustainability of the regions of the Russian Federation. Proceedings of the International Conference “Sustainable Development of Territories: GIS Theory and Practical Experience”. Perm, Ghent. June 29–July 5, 2009. P. 3 ̶ 11 (in Russian, abs English).
  10. Syukiyajnen L. Is Sharia Rule Compatible with Russian Rule? Pravo, High Economy School Journal, 2014. No 3. P. 4–30 (in Russian).
  11. Towards Sustainable Development: Indicators to Measure Progress. Proceedings of the OECD Rome Conference, 2000.

For citation: Rubanov I.N. Approach to elaboration of integral indicators for assessment of spatial objects characterisics and analyses of typical errors (on the base of sustainable development indicators and Russian regions as an example) InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2019. V. 25. Part 1. P. 5–17. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2019-1-25-5-17