View or download the article (Rus)
About the Authors
Pavel V. Druzhinin
Nevskogo, 50, 185030, Petrozavodsk, Russia,
E-mail: pdruzhinin@mail.ru
Nikolay N. Filatov
Nevskogo, 50, 185030, Petrozavodsk, Russia,
RAS Corr. Fellow,
E-mail: nfilatov@rambler.ru
Marina V. Moroshkina
Nevskogo, 50, 185030, Petrozavodsk, Russia,
E-mail: maribel@mail.ru
Olga V. Derusova
Nevskogo, 50, 185030, Petrozavodsk, Russia,
E-mail: derusova@petrsu.ru
Olga V. Potasheva
Nevskogo, 50, 185030, Petrozavodsk, Russia,
E-mail: lelyapotasheva@yandex.ru
Abstract
The article is devoted to studying of ekologo-economic processes on a reservoir of the White Sea. Development of economy in five regions entering a reservoir (Murmansk, Arkhangelsk, Vologda regions, Republics of Karelia and Komi Republic) was considered, the structure of the economy and the degree of its impact on the environment were analyzed. Information was collected on the regions as a whole and on municipalities. Graphs of economic and environmental indicators were constructed, and their interrelation was studied. Economic and ecological maps of the White Sea reservoir were built. It was shown that, in general, the economic development of the White Sea reservoir is slower, than of the Russian Federation as a whole. Based on the analysis of graphs and maps the models were constructed that made it possible to estimate the impact of development of the regional economy on the environment. The change in economic policy determined environmental and economic processes, three periods are singled out on the graphs—1990–1998, 1999–2008 and 2009–2016, when the type of dependence of environmental indicators on economic indicators is changing. In the first period, the economic decline determined the dynamics of environmental indicators, the best characteristics were found in a single-factor equation. In the second period, the impact of economic growth was compensated by investments in economic modernization and environmental investments and environmental indicators were slowly improving. Also positive impact was exerted by structural changes in economy. In the third period investments in modernization of the enterprises and conservation have decreased, as a result, despite insignificant economic growth at a part of regions ecological indicators have worsened. The constructed maps have allowed allocating the unfavorable territories and parts of the White Sea, which are most prone to negative impacts of economic objects.
Keywords
References
- Cole M.A., Neumayer E. Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Population and Development Review. 2004. V. 2 (1). P. 5–21.
- Cramer C.J. Population growth and air quality in California. Demography. 1998. V. 35 (1). P. 45–56.
- Dietz T., Rosa E.A. Rethinking the environmental impact of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review. 1994. V. 1. P. 277–300.
- Dietz T., Rosa E.A. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1997. V. 94 (1). P. 175–179.
- Druzhinin P.V., Shkiperova G.T. Ecological and Economic Models and Predictions in the Regional Management System. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2012. No 1, V. 23. P. 66–72 (in Russian).
- Druzhinin P.V. Razvitie severnyh territorij pod vlijaniem vneshnih shokov [Development of northern territories under the influence of external shocks]. North and the market: forming the economic order. 2017. No 1. P. 4–16 (in Russian).
- Granberg A.G. Makroekonomika Evropeiskogo severa Rossii [Macroeconomics of the European North of Russia]. The Economy of the North-West: Problems and Development Prospects, 2002. No 4. P. 3–10 (in Russian).
- Haritonova G.N. Management of environmental projects in the northern region of the federation: problems and solutions. North and the market: forming the economic order. 2017. No 4. P. 170–178 (in Russian).
- Lazhentsev V.N. North of Russia: alternatives for the future. Modern productive forces. 2013. No 2. P. 115–124 (in Russian).
- Martínez-Zarzoso I., Maruotti A. The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics. 2011. V. 70. P. 1344–1353.
- Masloboev V.A. Ensuring the environmental safety of Arctic communications. National interests of Russia and the economy of marine communications in the Arctic. Materials of the V Russian Scientific Conference. MGTU, 2014. P. 27–30 (in Russian).
- Selin V.S., Tsukerman V.A. Innovative tendencies as a factor in ensuring sustainable development of the economy of the North. Vestnik Kola Science Center, RAS. 2010. No 1. P. 88–94 (in Russian).
- Shevchuk A.V. Ecological and economic aspects of liquidation of accumulated damage in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Environmental Engineering. 2013. No 5. P. 80–83 (in Russian).
- Tatarkin A.I., Loginov V.G. Estimation of potential for natural resources and production in northern and arctic areas: conditions and prospects of use. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2015. No 1. P. 22–31 (in Russian).
- The White Sea and its catchment area under the influence of climatic and anthropogenic factors. Petrozavodsk: IPSK KarRC RAS, 2007. 335 p. (in Russian).
- York R., Rosa E.A., Dietz T. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics. 2003. V. 46 (3). P. 351–365.
- Zharov V.S., Ivanova M.V. Problems of managing the socio-economic development of the regions of the Arctic. Bulletin of the Murmansk state shock technical university. 2015. No 3. P. 393–400 (in Russian).
For citation: Druzhinin P.V., Filatov N.N., Moroshkina M.V., Derusova O.V., Potasheva O.V. MODELING AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITION OF THE WHITE SEA RESERVOIR. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS”. 2018;24(1):297–309 DOI: 10.24057/2414-9179-2018-1-24-297-309 (in Russian)