View or download the article (Rus)
About the Authors
Olga V. Chernova
33, Leninsky ave., Moscow, 119071, Russia,
E-mail: ovcher@mail.ru
Alla A. Prisyazhnaya
2, Institutskaya str., Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290, Russia,
E-mail: alla_pris@rambler.ru
Abstract
The areal representativeness in the state system of specially protected natural areas (SPNA) (nature reserves, national parks and wildlife sanctuaries) of the soil cover of large regions with similar natural conditions—plain and mountain soil provinces of the Soil-Ecological Zoning (SEZ) Map of the Russian Federation of scale 1:8 000 000—was assessed by the method of geoinformation analysis. The highest representation of soil cover in SPNA areas was found for the Eurasian polar soil-bioclimatic region, the lowest—for the Central deciduous-forest, forest-steppe and steppe soil-bioclimatic region. It has been shown that out of 101 SEZ’ provinces 14 (11 plain and 3 mountain) haven’t specially protected natural areas. On average, 3.4 % of the soil provinces’ area in Russia is protected in SPNA, mountain provinces are 2 times more provided with territorial nature protection compared to plain ones. A detailed analysis of the typological representativeness of the protected area system in relation to main soils of soils’ provinces was conducted using the example of the plain provinces of the Central deciduous-forest, forest-steppe and steppe soil-bioclimatic region. It is shown that at present 7 soils—legend units of the Soil Map of Russia of scale 1:2 500 000—which predominate in area in 9 plain SEZ’ provinces, are not provided with territorial protection. In total, they occupy 229.3 thous km2 in Russia. The most significant areas of these soils are located in the Ciscaucasia and in the south of Western Siberia. Most of these territories have been changed by economic activity, the need for additional environmental and soil monitoring sites is high, and the possibilities of their organization are small. In order to ensure territorial protection of the last fragments of provinces’ main soils with natural complexes and to create ecological monitoring sites there, it is necessary to survey the soil cover of regional protected areas and consider the possibilities of increasing the protection level for the most representative areas. In order to ensure territorial protection of the last fragments of provinces’ main soils with natural complexes and to organize ecological monitoring sites there, it is necessary to survey the soil cover of regional protected areas and consider the possibilities of increasing the protection level for the most representative areas.
Keywords
References
- Alyabina I.O., Chernova O.V., Prisyazhnaya A.A., Reshotkin O.V. Soil Cover of Nature Reserves and National Parks as a Reflection of the Zonal and Regional Features of the Territory of Russia. InterCarto. InterGIS. Proceedings of International Conference, 2023. V. 29. Part 1. P. 574–588 (in Russian). DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2023-1-29-574-588.
- Asaad I., Lundquist C., Erdmann M., Costello M. Ecological Criteria to Identify Areas for Biodiversity Conservation. Biological Conservation, 2016. V. 213. P. 309–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.007.
- Bezuglova O.S., Gorbov S.N., Litvinov Yu.A., Chernova O.V. Principles for Creating Soil Red Book for Rostov Region. Rostov-on-Don–Taganrog: Southern Federal University, 2022. 116 p. (in Russian).
- Chernova O.V., Prisyazhnaya A.A. Conservation of Soil Cover of the Steppe in Federal Specially Protected Natural Areas. Arid Ecosystems, 2024a. V. 14. No. 3. P. 298–306. DOI: 10.1134/S2079096124700240.
- Chernova O.V., Prisyazhnaya A.A. Conservation of Steppe Ecosystems Soil Diversity in Federal and Regional Protected Areas of Russia. Steppes of Northern Eurasia. Proceedings of International Symposium. Orenburg, 2024b. P. 1465–1473 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/cl-37200-2024-1465-1473.
- Chibilev A.A. Continuous Chain of the Key Nature Reserves in the Steppe Zone of the European Russian: Development Trends on the Base of Cross-Spectrum Analysis of Modern Landscape Structure. Steppe Science, 2018. No. 14. P. 36–44 (in Russian). DOI: 10.2441/9999-006A-2018-00001.
- Chibilev A.A. Landscape and Ecological Framework as a Territorial Base for Stable Development of Russian Agriculture Areas. South of Russia: Ecology, Development, 2022. V. 17. No. 2. P. 115–121 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18470/1992‐1098‐2022‐2‐115‐121.
- Donald P.F., Buchanan G.M., Balmford A., Bingham H., Couturier A.R., de la Rosa G.E. Jr., Gacheru P., Herzog S.K., Jathar G., Kingston N., Marnewick D., Maurer G., Reaney L., Shmygaleva T., Sklyarenko S., Stevens C.M.D., Butchart S.H.M. The Prevalence, Characteristics and Effectiveness of Aichi Target 11’s “Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures” (OECMs) in Key Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Letters, 2019. V. 12. Iss. 5. Art. e12659. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12659.
- Krever V.G., Stishov M.S., Onufrenya I.A. Specially Protected Natural Territories of Russia: Current State and Development Prospects. Moscow: Orbis Pictus, 2009. 456 p. (in Russian).
- Lee W.H., Abdullah S.A. Framework to Develop a Consolidated Index Model to Evaluate the Conservation Effectiveness of Protected Areas. Ecological Indicators, 2019. V. 102. P. 131–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.02.034.
- National Soil Atlas of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Astrel–AST, 2011. 632 p. (in Russian).
- Prisyazhnaya A.A., Chernova O.V., Mitenko G.V., Snakin V.V. Geoinformation Analysis of the Representativeness of the Network of Russian Federal Reserves and National Parks in Terms of Soil Diversity. Izvestia RAN. Seriya Geograficheskaya (News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series), 2024. V. 88. No. 6. P. 903–911 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2587556624060057.
- Prisyazhnaya A.A., Chernova O.V. Snakin V.V. Geoinformation Analysis of Chernozem Diversity and Protection in Russia. Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin, 2024. V. 79. No. 5. P. 620–630. DOI: 10.3103/S0147687424700650.
- Rodrigues Ana S.L., Cazalis V. The Multifaceted Challenge of Evaluating Protected Area Effectiveness. Nature Communications, 2020. V. 11. Art. 5147. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18989-2.
- Soil Map of the RSFSR. Scale 1:2 500 000. Adjusted digital version, 2007. Moscow: Main Directorate of Geodesy and Cartography, 1988. 16 p. (in Russian).
- Soils of Reserves and National Parks of the Russian Federation. Moscow: NIA-Priroda–Infosphere Foundation, 2012. 478 p. (in Russian).
- Stishov M.S. Development of the Russian Federal Nature Reserves System During 2009–2018 and its Trends. Moscow, 2020. 184 p. (in Russian).
- Tishkov A.A. The Concept of Biosphere Reserves of the MAB Programme and the Tasks of Biodiversity Conservation: Achievements and Challenges 50 Years Later. Geography Issues, 2021. No. 152. P. 62–100 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24057/probl.geogr.152.3.
- Urusevskaya I.S., Alyabina I.O., Shoba S.A. Soil-Geographical Zoning as a Direction of Science and as the Basis for Rational Land Use. Eurasian Soil Science, 2015. V. 48. No. 9. P. 897–910 (in Russian). DOI: 10.1134/S1064229315090112.
- Urusevskaya I.S., Alyabina I.O., Shoba S.A. Map of Soil-Ecological Zoning of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:8 000 000. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Soil Science, 2019а (in Russian). Web resource: https://soil-db.ru/map/eco (accessed 10.02.2025).
- Urusevskaya I.S., Martynenko I.A., Alyabina I.O. Crimea Soil Map. Scale 1:2 500 000. Map of Soil-Ecological Zoning of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Soil Science, 2019b (in Russian).
For citation: Chernova O.V., Prisyazhnaya A.A. State nature protected areas of Russia as the basis of the national system of background ecological monitoring. InterCarto. InterGIS. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2025. V. 31. Part 3. P. 672–688. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2025-3-31-672-688 (in Russian)









