Geoinformation mapping of the State Final Certification (SFC) results on the example of science cities in the Central Federal District

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2025-3-31-479-500

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Vladislav R. Gaidukov


Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography,
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia,
E-mail: gayd.vladislav2013@yandex.ru

Rakim K. Makhmudov

North-Caucasus Federal University,
1, Pushkina str., Stavropol, 355009, Russia,
E-mail: rakimkam@mail.ru

Abstract

In this article, a prototype of the concept of a geoinformation monitoring system for the State Final Certification (SFC) results in the Russian Federation is proposed. The features of the main source of statistical information on the results of the SFC, which is publicly available, are considered, and the use of these results is justified. The possibility of conducting geoinformation analysis at all possible territorial levels has been established and justified, on the basis of which the author’s methodology for studying the results of the state final certification of high school graduates is presented. The necessity of studying the results of the FSC with the indicators of the higher education system of the Russian Federation has been established. The territorial comparability of the statistical accounting of the metrics of the higher professional education system with the territorial accounting of the results of the SFC is described. The main types of analytical and cartographic materials aimed at quantifying the number of SFC participants without taking into account the exam results in the study area have been identified. The work was carried out with the aim of: assessing the impact of the status and type of territory, as well as the established higher education system on the choice of subjects, on assessing the quality of SFC results based on the number of graduates; mapping and analyzing SFC indicators in subjects; considering the possible number of future applicants participating in university admission campaigns. Using the developed methodology, a number of analytical materials were obtained that allow us to talk about the impact of the status of a municipality, which can affect not only the choice of subjects for the SFC, but also the quality of the exam. The proposed prototype of the SFC system made it possible to analyze the main parameters of the SFC and their relationship with the higher education system in Obninsk, as well as existing problems.

Keywords

cartography, geography of education, GIS, State Final Certification, geoinformation analysis

References

  1. Akaboev I.Z. The Importance of Population Mapping in Geographical Research. Economics and Society, 2019. No. 12 (67). P. 162–164 (in Russian).
  2. Khavenson T.E., Solovyova A.A. The Relationship between the Results of the Unified State Examination and Academic Performance at the University. Educational Studies, 2014. No. 1. P. 176–199 (in Russian).
  3. Leshukov O.V., Lisyutkin M.A. Management of Regional Higher Education Systems in Russia: Possible Approaches. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2015. No. 6 (100). P. 29–40 (in Russian).
  4. Pivovarova D.S., Bystrushkin A.Yu. The Main Problems of Modern Russian Education. Social and Economic Development of the Asia-Pacific Region: Problems, Experience, and Prospects: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference, Komsomolsk-on-Amur, April 14–30, 2020. Komsomolsk-on-Amur: Amur State University of Humanities and Education, 2020. P. 194–201 (in Russian).
  5. Reshetnikova O.A. The Main Directions of Using the Results of the Unified State Exam. Pedagogical Measurements, 2016. No. 3. P. 4–7 (in Russian).
  6. Shakaryants E.V. The Unified State Exam as a Form of Assessment of Educational Achievements. Intellectual Potential of the XXI Century: Stages of Knowledge. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2010. Part 1. P. 106–112 (in Russian).
  7. Shugal N.B., Varlamova T.A. Educational Trajectories of Children and Youth: Motivation and Choice. Moscow: Institute of Statistical Research and Knowledge Economics of the HSE, 2024. 92 p. (in Russian). Web resource: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/1024170732.pdf (accessed 20.01.2025).
  8. Sidorina I.E., Syuzyumov A.A., Rakova A.I., Andreeva T.A., Artemyeva O.V. Geoinformation Mapping in Modern Ethnographic, Religious, and Ethno-Religious Research. Kunstkamera, 2024. No. 2 (24). P. 61–79 (in Russian).
  9. Varlamova T.A., Gokhberg L.M., Zorina O.A., Kuznetsova V.I., Ozerova O.K., Portnyagina O.N., Shugal N.B. Education in Numbers: 2024. A Short Statistical Collection. Moscow: HSE, 2023. 129 p. (in Russian). Web resource: https://publications.hse.ru/books/988938560 (accessed 17.02.2025).

For citation: Gaidukov V.R., Makhmudov R.K. Geoinformation mapping of the State Final Certification (SFC) results on the example of science cities in the Central Federal District. InterCarto. InterGIS. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2025. V. 31. Part 3. P. 479–500. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2025-3-31-479-500 (in Russian)