Geoinformation analysis of spatial differentiation of the development of small towns in Russia in the post-pandemic period

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2025-3-31-110-127

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Zakhar S. Buchintsev

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia,
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia,
E-mail: zakharbuchintsev@gmail.com

Aleksandr N. Panin

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Research Laboratory of the Integrated Mapping,
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia,
E-mail: alex_panin@mail.ru

Nikolai V. Sopnev

North-Caucasian Federal University, Department of Socio-Economic Geography and Tourism,
1, Pushkina str., Stavropol, 355000, Russia,
E-mail: sopnev.stav@gmail.com

Abstract

Small towns, making up the vast majority of urban settlements in Russia and remaining the nodal elements of the spatial framework, continue to perform a critically important function of service centers for vast territories. Despite limited resources, demographic aging and a general tendency to shrink, their role in conditions of fragmentation of the developed space and reduction of the service sector in rural areas is only increasing. At the same time, this group of cities is extremely heterogeneous and demonstrates different development trajectories determined by a set of factors, among which the position in the settlement system relative to large cities and agglomeration centers is key. The relevance of the study is due to the need to analyze the position of small towns in the settlement system, primarily in relation to large agglomeration cores. In the context of increasing spatial polarization, it is of fundamental importance to identify patterns that determine the demographic dynamics of small towns, depending on the scale of the nearest large center and transport accessibility to it. The dominant trend of depopulation in most small towns is accompanied by the steady growth of a significant part of them, which indicates the complex nature of center-peripheral interactions and requires the use of modern analysis methods, including geoinformation technologies. International experience, especially in the light of the changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrates a structural shift in the spatial preferences of the population, creating new opportunities for the development of peripheral territories. The methodological basis of the study was a comprehensive GIS analysis, including spatial statistical methods and geoinformation modeling. To assess spatial interaction, the binary logistic regression method was used, and GIS tools were used to model the probability of demographic growth as a function of the scale of the central core and the distance to it. The conducted research revealed the fundamental patterns of the spatial organization of small towns in Russia in the context of agglomeration influence, demonstrating a clear center-peripheral influence on development. The revealed spatial structure is characterized by a multilevel organization with a regular alternation of growth and depression belts. Geoinformation modeling made it possible to determine critical distances with high accuracy and identify specific zones and thresholds.

Keywords

small towns, urban agglomerations, geoinformation monitoring, center-periphery, regression model

References

  1. Beaverstock J.G., Lorimer H., Smith R.G., Taylor P.J., Walker D.R.F. A Roster of World Cities. Cities, 1999. V. 16. No. 6. P. 445–458.
  2. Bell D., Jayne M. Small Cities: Urban Life Beyond the Metropolis. London: Routledge, 2006.
  3. Bell D., Jayne M. Small Cities? Towards a Research Agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2009. V. 33. Iss. 3. P. 683–699. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00886.x.
  4. Brennan C., Hackler D., Hoene C. Demographic Change in Small Cities, 1990 to 2000. Urban Affairs Review, 2005. V. 40. Iss. 3. P. 1–8. DOI: 10.1177/1078087404269161.
  5. Cherkasov A.A., Makhmudov R.K., Sopnev N.V. Spatial Analysis of Cities and Agglomerations: Integration of GIS and Big Data Technologies. Science. Innovations. Technologies, 2021a. No. 4. P. 95–112 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37493/2308-4758.2021.4.6.
  6. Cherkasov A.A., Sopnev N.V., Panin A.N. GIS-monitoring of Modern Transformation of the Demographic Structure of Regions and Large Cities of the South of the European part of Russia. InterCarto. InterGIS. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, 2021b. V. 27. Part 4. P. 347–360 (in Russian). DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-4-27-347-360.
  7. Chernysh M., Markin V. Spatial Development of Small Towns: Social Strategies and Practices. Moscow: Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020. 523 p. (in Russian). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-335-5.2020.
  8. Christopherson S. Creative Economy Strategies for Small and Medium Size Cities: Options for New York State. Albany, NY: Quality Communities Marketing and Economics Workshop, 2004. 21 p.
  9. Florinskaya Yu., Roshhina T. Life Plans of School Graduates from Small Towns. Chelovek (The Human Being), 2005. No. 5. P. 112–119 (in Russian).
  10. Furze M., Barkhurst C., Childs M. Small Town Sustainability: Economic, Social and Environmental Innovation. Journal of Urban Design, 2010. V. 15. P. 449–450.
  11. Gun’ko M.S. Interrelations of Small Towns and Rural Areas in Central Russia. Author’s abstract of the dissertation for PhD in geographical sciences. Moscow: Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. 26 p. (in Russian).
  12. Hornbeck R., Michaels G., Rauch F. Identifying Agglomeration Shadows: Long-Run Evidence from Ancient Ports. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024. NBER Working Paper No. w32634. 68 p. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4881215.
  13. Ivlieva N.G., Dolgacheva T.A., Manukhov V.F., Buchatskaya N.V. The Use of GIS Technologies to Assess the Social Comfort of Living in the City. InterCarto. InterGIS, 2010. V. 16. P. 140–144 (in Russian).
  14. Jiang L., O’Neill B.C. Determinants of Urban Growth During Demographic and Mobility Transitions: Evidence from India, Mexico, and the US. Population and Development Review, 2018. V. 44. Iss. 2. No. 1. P. 59–85. DOI: 10.1111/padr.12150.
  15. Kalabikhina I.E., Panin A.N. Spatial Choreography of the Coronavirus. Population and Economics, 2020. No. 4 (2). P. 123–152. DOI: 10.3897/popecon.4.e54487.
  16. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V., Petrosian A.N. Spatial Patterns of Net Migration in the Suburbs of Russian Regional Centers. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya (Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography), 2021. No. 6. P. 123–134 (in Russian).
  17. Makarova M.N. (2017). Small Towns in the Spatial Structure of Regional Population Distribution. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. V. 10. No. 2. P. 181–194 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.2.50.10.
  18. Makhrova A.G. Specific Features of Stadial Development of the Moscow Agglomeration. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya (Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography), 2014. No. 4. P. 10–16 (in Russian).
  19. Meijers E., Burger M. Stretching the Concept of “Borrowed Size”. Urban Studies, 2017. V. 54. Iss. 1. P. 269–291. DOI: 10.1177/0042098015597642.
  20. Mkrtchyan N.V. The Youth Migration from Small Towns in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2017. No. 1 (137). P. 225–242 (in Russian). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2017.1.15.
  21. Panagiotopoulou M., Kokla M., Stratigea A. Conceptualizing Small and Medium-Sized Smart Cities in the Mediterranean Region: An Ontological Approach. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 2019. V. 8. Iss. 4. P. 17–41. DOI: 10.4018/IJEPR.2019100102.
  22. Sandow E., Lundholm E. Which Families Move Out from Metropolitan Areas? Counter Urban Migration and Professions in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2020. V. 27. Iss. 3. P. 276–289. DOI: 10.1177/0969776419893017.
  23. Senetra A., Szarek-Iwaniuk P. Socio-Economic Development of Small Towns in the Polish Cittaslow Network—A Case Study. Cities, 2020. V. 103. Iss. 1. P. 102758. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102758.
  24. Servillo L., Atkinson R., Hamdouch A. Small and Medium-Sized Towns in Europe: Conceptual, Methodological and Policy Issues. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2017. V. 108. Iss. 4. P. 365–379. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12252.
  25. Tikunov V.S., Panin A.N., Gaidukov V.R. Atlas Information System for Producing Integral Indices of the Socio-Economic Development of Territories. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya (Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography), 2023. V. 78. No. 4. P. 66–74 (in Russian). DOI: 10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.78.4.6.

For citation: Buchintsev Z.S., Panin A.N., Sopnev N.V. Geoinformation analysis of spatial differentiation of the development of small towns in Russia in the post-pandemic period. InterCarto. InterGIS. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2025. V. 31. Part 3. P. 110–127. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2025-3-31-110-127 (in Russian)