GIS analysis of the role of large cities of the Stavropol Krai in the demographic agenda of the South of Russia

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2025-3-31-82-99

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Aleksandr A. Cherkasov

North Caucasus Federal University,
1, Pushkina str., Stavropol, 355009, Russia,
E-mail: cherkasov_stav@mail.ru

Vitaly M. Eshrokov

North Caucasus Federal University,
1, Pushkina str., Stavropol, 355009, Russia,
E-mail: eshrokov@mail.ru

Abstract

The article presents a GIS analysis of the role of cities in Stavropol Krai with a population of over 100 thous. people in the demographic agenda of the South of Russia. The study used a range of quantitative indicators (natural and mechanical movement, population dynamics, average age, age and sex structure), on the basis of which cartographic works and a multifactorial model were developed. The statistical base was the official materials of Rosstat 2015–2021 and the All-Russian Population Census 2020. Six cities in Stavropol Krai are compared with 30 similar cities located in the North Caucasian and Southern Federal Districts. An analysis of population dynamics in the period 2015–2021 shows that the studied cities were divided into three groups by the nature of changes in the number of residents: growing, stable, shrinking. Depending on the contribution of migration and demographic components to the population dynamics, subgroups are identified in the groups. It has been established that the cities of the reference group differ in their “demographic behavior” and these differences are primarily related to the population size and the city’s belonging to a particular population class. A comparative analysis has shown that the cities of Stavropol Krai are noticeable in the demographic agenda of the region by a number of parameters. Stavropol with its satellite city of Mikhailovsk and the resort town of Yessentuki demonstrate high attractiveness for migrants, primarily from neighboring regions. In Nevinnomyssk, Kislovodsk and Pyatigorsk, negative trends in natural population decline are noted against the background of relatively low rates of migration outflow. In general, each city has its own role, trends and reasons that determine the dynamics of the population.

Keywords

cities, geographic information technologies, demographic processes, population dynamics, Southern Russia

References

  1. Bruy A., Ferrero V.O., Graser A., Mandel A., Mearns B. QGIS: Becoming a GIS. Power User. Master Data Management, Visualization, and Spatial Analysis Techniques in QGIS and Become a GIS Power User, 2017. 817 p.
  2. Cherkasov A.A., Belozerov V.S., Shchitova N.A., Sopnev N.V. Geoinformation Monitoring of Demographic Processes in the Regions of the South of European Russia. InterCarto. InterGIS. Proceedings of International Conference, 2020. V. 26. Part 1. P. 127–140 (in Russian). DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-127-140.
  3. Cherkasov A.A., Makhmudov R.K. Atlas Information System “Population of the Stavropol Krai”. Geodesy and Cartography, 2022. V. 83. No. 12. P. 31–39 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2022-990-12-31-39990-12-31-39.
  4. Florida R. Who’s Your City? Creative Economy and the Choice of Residence. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2014. 368 p. (in Russian).
  5. Gusein-Zade S.M., Tikunov V.S. Visualisation in Noneuclidean Metrics. Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2015. 213 p.
  6. Igonin A.I., Tikunov V.S. Mathematical and Cartographic Modeling and Mapping of the Demographic Situation in the Regions of Europe and Russia. Science. Innovations. Technologies, 2019. No. 3. P. 115–130 (in Russian).
  7. Ippolitova N.A. Population as One of the Indicators of Socio-Economic Development of Cities (On the Example of Siberian Regions). Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions, 2018. V. 4 (14). No. 4. P. 175–186 (in Russian).
  8. Karachurina L.B. Population Dynamics of Regional Centers and Second Cities in Russia: Are there Tendencies Toward Polycentrism? Izvestia RAN. Seriya Geograficheskaya (News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series), 2018. No. 4. P. 7–21 (in Russian). DOI: 10.1134/S2587556618040076.
  9. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V. Intraregional Migration of the Population in Russia: Suburbs Win Over Capitals. Izvestia RAN. Seriya Geograficheskaya (News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series), 2021. V. 85. No. 1. P. 24–38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2587556621010076.
  10. Lappo G.M. Geography of cities. Moscow: Humanitarian Publishing Center VLADOS, 1997. 480 p. (in Russian).
  11. Mkrtchyan N.V., Gilmanov R.I. Large Cities of Russia and Their Suburbs as Centers of Attraction for Internal Migrants. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 2023. V. 68. No. 1. P. 44–63 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu07.2023.103.
  12. Solovyov I.A. Dynamics of Intraregional Features of Population Migration in Stavropol Krai. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 2022. No. 1. P. 156–180 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu07.2022.109.
  13. Sopnev N.V., Belozerov V.S. Migration Processes in Regional Capitals of the South of European Russia. Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions, 2021. V. 7. No. 4. P. 103–117 (in Russian).
  14. Zaionchkovskaya Zh.A., Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V., Florinskaya Yu.F., Abylkalikov S.I., Seredkina E.A. Migration Processes in Russia. Population of Russia 2017: Twenty-Fifth Annual Demographic Report. Moscow: Publishing House of the HSE, 2019. Ch. 6. P. 382–458 (in Russian).
  15. Zubarevich N.V., Safronov S.G. Development of Large Cities in Russia in the 2000s. Regional Research, 2019. No. 1. P. 39–51 (in Russian). DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2019-1-4.

For citation: Cherkasov A.A., Eshrokov V.M. GIS analysis of the role of large cities of the Stavropol Krai in the demographic agenda of the South of Russia. InterCarto. InterGIS. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2025. V. 31. Part 3. P. 82–99. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2025-3-31-82-99 (in Russian)