View or download the article (Rus)
About the Authors
Ivan I. Kiryunin
Komsomolskaya str., 95, 302026, Orel, Russia;
E-mail: ivankiryunin@ya.ru
Vladimir I. Tikhii
Komsomolskaya str., 95, 302026, Orel, Russia;
E-mail: tikhiivi@ya.ru
Abstract
From the late 1980s to the present, the “ceiling” of urbanization has been reached in the Oryol region—the share of the urban population is in the range of 62–66 %, around the city of Oryol, in rural areas, a large number of the population is concentrated, the number of which is growing. Often, in the territorial planning system, the area of contact between urban and rural territories is not distinguished in any way, the development strategy of this territory cannot have the expected result. In this regard, the main purpose of the work was an attempt to identify the suburban area of the city of Orel using the method of transport zoning, which is based on the analysis of transport communication. The method of transport zoning of suburban areas allows us to estimate the territorial concentration of the suburban population in individual parts of the district. Each zone differs in the transport conditions of settlement, including the conditions of transport service. The paper presents the result of the application of the methodology for identifying suburban areas as territories served by different modes of transport on the example of the city of Orel. Based on the assessment of the differentiation of transport mobility of the population, as the most important condition for the quality of life, the zoning of the suburb of Orel was carried out. Its structural zones are highlighted—the neighborhood of the city, the near suburb and the far suburb. To achieve the purpose of the study, data from the All-Russian population censuses, OpenStreetMap data, and field research information were used. Based on these data, maps were built in QGIS that visually display the phenomena under study, and the zoning of the Oryol Municipal District was carried out. The article also concludes that transport communication radically affects the settlement system of the population, demonstrates the tendency of settlement in areas with better transport links.
Keywords
References
- Albouy D. Are Big Cities Bad Places to Live? Estimating Quality of Life across Metropolitan Areas. 2008. 67 p. DOI: 10.3386/w14472.
- Banzhaf E., Reyes-Paecke S., Müller A., Kindler A. Do demographic and land-use changes contrast urban and suburban dynamics? A sophisticated reflection on Santiago de Chile. Habitat Int. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 179–191.
- Berry S., Waldfogel J. Product quality and market size. J. Ind. Econ. 2010. Vol. 58 (1). P. 1–31.
- Clapson M., Hutchison R. Introduction: Suburbanization in global society. Res. Urban. Sociol. Suburb. Glob. Soc. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 1–14.
- Forman R.T. Urban. Regions: Ecology and Planning beyond the City. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. 408 p.
- Forsyth A. Defining suburbs. J. Plan. Lit. 2012. Vol. 27. P. 270–281.
- Geneletti D., Marcin S., Chiara C. A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2017. Vol. 165. P. 231–243.
- Gianotti A.G., Getson J.M., Hutyra L.R., Kittredge D.B. Defining urban, suburban, and rural: A method to link perceptual definitions with geospatial measures of urbanization in central and eastern Massachusetts. Urban. Ecosyst. 2016. Vol. 19. P. 823–833.
- Glaeser E.L. Cities, agglomeration and spatial equilibrium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Vol. 49 (3). P. 568–571.
- Glaeser E.L., Kolko J., Saiz A. Consumer city. J. Econ. Geogr. 2001. Vol. 1 (1). P. 27–50.
- Gober P., Behr M. Central cities and suburbs as distinct place types: Myth or fact? Econ. Geogr. 1982. Vol. 58. P. 371–385.
- Gordon D.L., Janzen M. Suburban nation? Estimating the size of Canada’s suburban population. J. Archit. Plan. Res. 2013. P. 197–220.
- Heris M.P. Evaluating metropolitan spatial development: A method for identifying settlement types and depicting growth patterns. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci. 2017. Vol. 4. P. 7–25.
- Johnson L., Andrews F., Warner E. The centrality of the Australian suburb: Mobility challenges and responses by outer suburban residents in Melbourne. Urban. Policy Res. 2017. Vol. 35. P. 409–423.
- Kiryunin I.I., Artamoshin A.N. Statistical analysis of demographic processes in the Orel region. Collection of materials of participants of the XVII Great Geographical Festival dedicated to the 195th anniversary of the Russian circumnavigation of F.P. Litke (1826–1829). St. Petersburg, 02–04 April. 2021. St. Petersburg: Its Publishing House, 2021. P. 731–735 (in Russian).
- Lenzi C. Perucca G. Life satisfaction across cities: evidence from Romania. J. Dev. Stud. 2016. Vol. 52 (7):10. P. 62–77.
- Mace A. Suburbanization. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. P. 77–81.
- Moroke T., Schoeman C., Schoeman I. Developing a neighborhood sustainability assessment model: An approach to sustainable urban development. Sustain. Cities Soc. Vol. 48. 2019. p. 101433.
- Polyan P.M. Territorial structures–urbanization–settlement. Moscow: New chronograph, 2014. 788 p. (in Russian).
- Tian Y. Mapping Suburbs Based on Spatial Interactions and Effect Analysis on Ecological Landscape Change: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province from 1998 to 2018, Eastern China. Land, 2020. Vol. 9 (5). 159 p.
- Voronezhtsev I.S. The structure of suburban settlement by transport service zones. Bulletin of VSU. Series: geography, geoecology. 2013. No. 2. P. 65–70 (in Russian).
- Zavodskikh A.A., Tikhii V.I., Shumetov V.G. Modeling of population movement processes in the regions of the Central Federal District. Regional Economy: theory and practice. 2017. Vol. 15. Iss. 4. P. 772–783 (in Russian).
- Žlender V. Characterisation of peri-urban landscape based on the views and attitudes of different actors. Land Use Policy. 2021. Vol. 101. P. 193–205.
For citation: Kiryunin I.I., Tikhii V.I. Analysis and mapping of the structure of suburban settlement of the city of Orel. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2022. V. 28. Part 2. P. 160–171. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2022-2-28-160-171 (in Russian)