Geoinformational assessment of the interest of internet users in the border region to cross-border mobility

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2022-2-28-146-159

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Anna A. Mikhaylova

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Institute of Geopolitical and Regional Studies,
A. Nevskogo str., 14, 236016, Kaliningrad, Russia;
E-mail: tikhonova.1989@mail.ru

Dmitriy V. Hvaley

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University,
A. Nevskogo str., 14, 236016, Kaliningrad, Russia;
E-mail: hvaley_gusev@mail.ru

Andrey S. Mikhaylov

Institute of Geography RAS, Center for Geopolitical Studies,
Staromonetny pereulok, 29, 119017, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: mikhailov.andrey@yahoo.com

Abstract

Features of the economic-geographical position of the border regions are manifested, on the one hand, in their territorial proximity to foreign markets, international resource flows and infrastructure, and on the other hand, in their location on the periphery of the national spaces of neighboring states. In this regard, the economy of the borderland, in comparison with the inland regions, is more closely integrated into the international agenda and is more dependent on the permeability of the state border. An important component of the competitive potential of border areas is the development of the transport and logistics system, including its ability to ensure the efficiency and sustainability of international passenger and cargo transportation. The global course towards the digitalization of all social relations has also influenced such a traditional area of economic activity as transport. The growth of digital literacy and accessibility of the Internet, the expansion of the variety of information and communication channels and specialized digital services have created new opportunities for the border regions of neighboring countries to develop cooperation in relation to cross-border mobility of the population and joint management of this process. The digital environment is becoming an increasingly important component in maintaining the transport and logistics connectivity of border areas, and its development is accompanied by the generation and accumulation of an increasing amount of digital data about users. This article proposes an approach to assessing the geography of the interest of internet users of the border region in cross-border movement based on the analysis of big digital data. On the example of the Kaliningrad region (exclave territory of the Russian Federation), the level of attractiveness for Internet users of transport routes, covering the settlements of neighboring countries—Poland and Lithuania, located no further than 100 km from the border, was analyzed in the period from midJanuary to mid-March 2022. The data source is the Yandex Wordstat service. Based on the results of a study of search queries in relation to 194 cities of the Polish and Lithuanian adjacent border areas, two main types were identified—the final points of the route and transport hubs with outgoing mobility to other cities and countries. In total, the interest of users from the Kaliningrad region covered 130 international destinations. The conclusion is made about the transport connectivity of the border regions of Poland, Lithuania and the Kaliningrad region of Russia, however, the digitalization of this process remains off-system in nature.

Keywords

cross-border mobility, digital data, internet, cartography, geography of movement, transport routes, cross-border routines, Kaliningrad region

References

  1. Bardal A.B., Sigitova M.A. The Development of Transport Service of the Population of the Border Region: Khabarovsky Krai (Part I). Bulletin of PNU. 2018. Vol. 1. No. 48. P. 109–118 (in Russian).
  2. Berezhnaya L.Y. The Role of Transport Infrastructure in Development of Border Region. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2021. Vol. 4. P. 109–117. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2021-4-109-117 (in Russian).
  3. Bigo D. The socio-genesis of a guild of “digital technologies” justifying transnational interoperable databases in the name of security and border purposes: a reframing of the field of security professionals? International Journal of Migration and Border Studies. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 1–2. P. 74–92.
  4. Bobrova V.V., Berezhnaya L.Yu. The mechanism of influence of transport infrastructure on the socio-economic development of the cross-border region. Ekonomika, predprinimatelstvo i parvo. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 10. P. 2381–2398. DOI: 10.18334/epp.11.10.113740 (in Russian).
  5. Fedorov G.M. The Kaliningrad dilemma: a “development corridor” or a “double periphery”? The geopolitical factor of the development of the Russian exclave on the Baltic Sea. Baltic region. 2010. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 4–12. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2010-2-1 (in Russian).
  6. Gössling S. ICT and transport behavior: A conceptual review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 153–164. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1338318.
  7. Gumenyuk I.S. Transportnaya bezopasnost’. Problemy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regionov zapadnogo porubezh’ya Rossii: monografiya [Transport security. Problems of economic security of the regions of the western border of Russia: monograph]. Edited by G.M. Fedorov. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Kaliningrad, 2019. P. 139–158 (in Russian).
  8. Gumenyuk I.S., Studzieniecki T. Current and prospective transport connections between Poland’s border voivodeships and Russia’s Kaliningrad region. Baltic Region. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 114–132. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2018-2-8 (in Russian).
  9. Gumenyuk I.S., Voloshenko K.Yu., Novikova A.A. Scenarios of increasing the economic efficiency of the Kaliningrad regional transport system. Baltic region. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 51–72. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-2-4 (in Russian).
  10. Ivanova N. Digitalization of the transport complex as the most important condition of forming modern transport infrastructure. Transport business in Russia. 2020. Vol. 1. P. 71–75 (in Russian).
  11. Khmeleva G.A., Fedorenko R.V. Main trends and factors of cross-border regions competitive advantages. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 439–458. DOI: 10.18334/eo.11.2.112112 (in Russian).
  12. Kolosov V.A., Zotova M.V., Sebentsov A.B. Barrierfunction of Russian borders. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2016. Vol. 5. P. 8–20. DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2016-5-8-20 (in Russian).
  13. Kondrateva S. Factors of development of border tourism in related territories of Russia and Finland. Pskov regional studies journal. 2019. Vol. 40. No. 4. P. 106–114. DOI: 10.37490/S221979310011766-5 (in Russian).
  14. Lapenko M.V., Onuchko M.Yu. From contact to barrier: the Russian-Kazakh border and cross-border cooperation in the context of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Postsovetskie issledovaniya = Post-Soviet Studies. 2021. Vol. 4. No. 7. P. 604–615. DOI: 10.24412/2618-7426-2021-7-604-614 (in Russian).
  15. Mikhaylov A.S. Cross-border clustering across the Baltic region: Relating smart specialization and cluster categories. In: Fedorov G., Druzhinin A., Golubeva E., Subetto D., Palmowski T. (Eds.) Baltic Region—The Region of Cooperation. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham, 2020. P. 99–108. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14519-4_11.
  16. Trauttmansdorff P., Felt U. Between infrastructural experimentation and collective imagination: the digital transformation of the EU border regime. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/01622439211057523.
  17. Zotova M.V., Kolosov V.A., Gritsenko A.A., Sebentsov A.B., Karpenko M.S. Territorial gradients in the socioeconomic development of the Russian border regions. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2018a. Vol. 5. P. 7–21. DOI: 10.1134/S2587556618050163 (in Russian).
  18. Zotova M.V., Kolosov V.A., Sebentsov A.B. Barrier functions and the transparency of borders. Russian borderlands: challenges of neighbourhood. Moscow: Publisher Individual entrepreneur Matushkina I.I., 2018b. P. 86–108 (in Russian).
  19. Zverev Yu.M. External factors and possible scenarios for the development of the Kaliningrad region. International Conference Proceedings: Factors and strategies of regional development in the changing geopolitical and geo-economic context. Edited by A.G. Druzhinin. Rostov-on-Don, 2016. P. 230–235 (in Russian).

For citation: Mikhaylova A.A., Hvaley D.V., Mikhaylov A.S. Geoinformational assessment of the interest of internet users in the border region to cross-border mobility. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2022. V. 28. Part 2. P. 146–159. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2022-2-28-146-159 (in Russian)