The “Country of cities” web-GIS: development experience and approaches used in creating a history-oriented geoportal

https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2021-4-27-482-494

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Artur M. Gafurov

Kazan federal University, Institute of ecology and environmental Sciences,
5 Tovarishcheskaya St., 420097, Kazan, Russia;
E-mail: amgafurov@kpfu.ru

Bulat M. Usmanov

Kazan Federal University, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences,
5 Tovarishcheskaya St., 420097, Kazan, Russia;
E-mail: busmanof@kpfu.ru

Oleg P. Yermolayev

Kazan Federal University, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences,
5 Tovarishcheskaya St., 420097, Kazan, Russia;
E-mail: oleg.yermolayev@kpfu.ru

Airat M. Gubaidullin

Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, A.Kh. Khalikov Institute of Archaeology,
30 Butlerova St., 420012, Kazan, Russia;
E-mail: airg_g@mail.ru

Petr V. Khomyakov

Kazan Federal University, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences,
5 Tovarishcheskaya St.. 5, 420097, Kazan, Russia;
E-mail: petr.khomyakov@kpfu.ru

Iskander I. Gainullin

Innopolis University, GIS Center,
1 Universitetskaya St., 420500, Innopolis, Russia;
E-mail: i.gainullin@innopolis.ru

Abstract

Providing convenient access to spatial information for multiple users is a big challenge. To solve this problem, researchers present the results of their research on thematic geoportals—geographic information systems (GIS) located on the Web. The main functionality of such web-GIS, in addition to directly displaying interactive spatial information, is the possibility of making custom searches, measuring lengths and areas, and providing access to related multimedia materials. Archaeological geoportals, unlike other thematic GIS, require special approaches to the implementation, as there is a necessity to provide convenient access not only to spatial information, but also a gallery of multimedia materials, as well as detailed descriptions. This paper describes the approach to the development of cartographic web-resource “Country of Cities” which provides access to the results of interdisciplinary research of Volga Bulgarian settlements. for user-friendly access to both cartographic and descriptive materials, it was decided to divide the geoinformation and analytical component into two separate but interconnected portals within one web resource. Web-GIS is based on the leaflet library and provides interactive access, besides the information about each ancient settlement itself, to the series of analytical maps—risk map of the development of exogenous processes, risk map of the destruction of ancient settlements, their present state, and many others. The main graphic and descriptive materials are presented on the web portal, where a special page was created for each ancient settlement with a descriptive block, a gallery with images of the settlement from an unmanned aerial vehicle, thematic and historical maps, as well as an interactive three-dimensional textured model of the corresponding archaeological site.

Keywords

geoportal, GIS, UAV, Volga Bulgaria, ancient settlements, 3D.

References

  1. Allen M., Blick N., Brindle T., Evan T., Fulford M., Holbrook N., Lodwick L., Richards J.D., Smith A. The Rural Settlement of Roman Britain: an online resource, 2015. DOI: 10.5284/1030449.
  2. Banfi F., Previtali M., Stanga C., Brumana R. A layered-web interface based on HBIM and 360deg panoramas for historical, material and geometric analysis. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Copernicus GmbH, 2019. V. 73–80. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-73-2019.
  3. Bezzi L., Bezzi A., Boscaro C., Feistmantl K., Gietl R., Naponiello G., Ottati N., De Guzman M. Commercial Archaeology and 3D Web Technologies. J. Field Archaeol., 2018. V. 43. No. sup1. P. S45–S59. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2018.1505410.
  4. Boutsi A.-M., Ioannidis C., Soile S. An Integrated Approach to 3D Web Visualization of Cultural Heritage Heterogeneous Datasets. Remote Sens., 2019. V. 11. No. 21. P. 2508. DOI: 10.3390/rs11212508.
  5. Buryak Z.A., Lisetskii F.N., Ilyashenko S.V. Geoinformation analytical system “Archaeological sites of Crimea”. Geod. Cartogr., 2019. V. 942. No. 12. P. 29–40. DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2018-942-12-29-40.
  6. Cisternino D., Gatto C., D’Errico G., De Luca V., Barba M.C., Paladini G.I., De Paolis L.T. Virtual Portals for a Smart Fruition of Historical and Archaeological Contexts. Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Ed. by L.T. De Paolis, P. Bourdot. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. P. 264–273. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25999-0_23.
  7. Cioé F., Merlonghi M. The Crisis Areas Archaeological Database (CAAD): a WebGIS for monitoring and safeguarding archaeological heritage. Interactions and New Directions in Near Eastern Archaeology. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2017. P. 77–91.
  8. Crickard P. Leaflet.js essentials: create interactive, mobile-friendly mapping applications using the incredibly light yet powerful leaflet.js platform. Birmingham, UK: Packt Pub, 2014. 162 p.
  9. Eichert S. Digital Mapping of Medieval Cemeteries: Case Studies from Austria and Czechia. J. Comput. Cult. Herit., 2021. V. 14. No. 1. P. 3:1–3:15. DOI: 10.1145/3406535
  10. Ermolaev O.P., Mal’tsev K.A., Mukharamova S.S., Kharchenko S.V., Vedeneeva E.A. Cartographic model of river basins of European Russia. Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2017. V. 38. No. 2. P. 131–138. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372817020032.
  11. Gafurov A., Gainullin I., Usmanov B., Khomyakov P., Kasimov A. Impacts of fluvial processes on medieval settlement Lukovskoe (Tatarstan, Russia). Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci., 2019. V. 381. P. 31–35. DOI: 10.5194/piahs-381-31-2019.
  12. Gafurov A. The Methodological Aspects of Constructing a High-Resolution DEM of Large Territories Using Low-Cost UAVs on the Example of the Sarycum Aeolian Complex, Dagestan, Russia. Drones, 2021. V. 5. No. 1. P. 7. DOI: 10.3390/drones 5010007.
  13. Gafurov A.M., Yermolayev O.P. Automatic Gully Detection: Neural Networks and Computer Vision. Remote Sens. 2020. V. 12. No. 11. P. 1743. DOI: 10.3390/rs12111743.
  14. Gainullin I.I., Khomyakov P.V., Sitdikov A.G., Usmanov B.M. Qualitative assessment of the medieval fortifications condition with the use of remote sensing data (Republic of Tatarstan). Fifth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2017), 2017. P. 104440X. DOI: 10.1117/12.2279136.
  15. Ivanov M., Abdullin H., Gainullin I., Gafurov A., Usmanov B., Williamson J. Using XVIII–XIX Cent. Maps and Modern Remote Sensing Data for Detecting the Changes in the Land Use at Bulgarian Fortified Settlements in the Volga Region. Earth, 2021. V. 2. No. 1. P. 51–65. DOI: 10.3390/earth2010004.
  16. Karabegovic A., Ponjavic M. Geoportal as Interface for Data Warehouse and Business Intelligence Information System. Advances in Business ICT Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Ed. by M. Mach-Król, T. Pełech-Pilichowski. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. P. 27–40. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03677-9_2
  17. Korobov D. Fundamentals of geoinformatics in archeology. Moskow: MGU, 2011. 224 p.
  18. Lisetskii F.N., Buryak Z.A., Zelenskaya Evgenia Ya. The Infrastructure of Land Management in the Post–Antique Agrolandscapes of Crimea. Biogeosystem Tech., 2018. V. 5. No. 1. P. 71–86. DOI: 10.13187/bgt.2018.1.71.
  19. Lynch A. The national monuments service: (Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government). Natl. Monum. Serv. Dep. Environ. Herit. Local Gov., 2008. V. 22. No. 2. P. 10–12.
  20. Makarov N.A., Zelentsova O.V., Korobov D.S., Voroshilov A.N. The space of antiquity: Archaeological sites on the map of Russia. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci., 2017. V. 87. No. 4. P. 336–347. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331617030078.
  21. Mares D., Moschek W. Place in Time: GIS and the Spatial Imagination in Teaching History. History and GIS: Epistemologies, Considerations and Reflections. Ed. by A. von Lünen, C. Travis. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. P. 59–72. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5009-8_5.
  22. Nishanbaev I. A web repository for geo-located 3D digital cultural heritage models. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2020. V. 16. P. e00139. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00139.
  23. Pouncett J. The Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland Online. Hillforts: Britain, Ireland and the Nearer Continent. Ed. by G. Lock, I. Ralston. England: Archaeopress, 2019. P. 155–162.
  24. Reinhold S., Belinskiy A., Korobov D. Caucasia top-down: Remote sensing data for survey in a high altitude mountain landscape. Quat. Int., 2016. V. 402. P. 46–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.106.
  25. She B., Hu T., Zhu X., Bao S. Bridging open source tools and Geoportals for interactive spatial data analytics. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci., 2019. V. 22. No. 3. P. 185–192. DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2019.1645497.
  26. Yermolaev O., Usmanov B. The basin approach to the anthropogenic impact assessment in oil-producing region, 2014. P. 681–688. DOI: 10.5593/SGEM2014/B52/S20.090.

For citation: Gafurov A.M., Usmanov B.M., Yermolayev O.P., Gubaidullin A.M., Khomyakov P.V., Gainullin I.I. The “Country of cities” web-GIS: development experience and approaches used in creating a history-oriented geoportal InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2021. V. 27. Part 4. P. 482–494. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-4-27-482-494 (In Russian)