View or download the article (Rus)
About the Authors
Alexander P. Karpik
Plakhotnogo St., 10, 630108, Novosibirsk, Russia;
E-mail: rector@ssga.ru
Dmitry V. Lisitsky
Plakhotnogo St., 10, 630108, Novosibirsk, Russia;
E-mail: dlis@ssga.ru
Aleksey G. Osipov
Plakhotnogo St., 10, 630108, Novosibirsk, Russia;
E-mail: a.g.osipov@ssga.ru
Vyacheslav N. Savinykh
K. Marx prospect, 20, 630073, Novosibirsk, Russia;
E-mail: savinslav@inbox.ru
Abstract
The issues of using geospatial data, information and knowledge in the processes of analysis and forecasting of socio-economic development of territories are considered. It is proposed to expand the composition of a single complex of means for macroeconomic interregional intersectoral planning due to a more complete consideration of the geospatial features of the studied territory and the transition to a new model of spatial and economic policy based on the widespread use of digital geoplatforms. The article provides information on the importance of geospatial support for planning and management of territories for the sustainable development of their economy and social sphere and information on the support of this industry at the international (UN) and national levels of the most developed countries of the world. The purpose of the research is indicated—the substantiation of the methodology for productive and effective geospatial support for the solutions of analytical and forecasting tasks, which increases the level of taking into account the territorial features of the regions. A new term “geocognitive modeling of the territory” and theoretical and methodological approaches to assessing this process to ensure strategic regional planning are proposed. A number of initial conceptual provisions have been formulated, including: geodata and geoinformation are more in demand at the microlevel of the economy, and geoscience at the macrolevel of the economy. geosciences refer to certain subject-spatial heterogeneities and they can be represented as a special type of spatial objects and processed by means of gIS. A list of indicators of a separate geofragment of the territory for use in strategic planning is given. The proposed method for solving the geospatial problem of assessing the synergetic effect in the interaction of natural resources with the transport system by increasing the connectivity of territories is described. As an example, a model of cognitive indexing of geofragments is proposed and its set-theoretic representation is given. The conclusion is made about the need for a more complete use of geospatial tools in planning the development of regions, which will reduce the risks of making unreasonable managerial decisions and take into account the influence of the human factor.
Keywords
References
- Bobylev S.N., Chereshnya Olga Yu., Kulmala M., Lappalainen H.K., Petäjä T., Solov’eva S.V., Tikunov V.S., Tynkkynen V.P. Indicators for digitalization of sustainable development goals in peex program. geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2018. V. 11. No. 1. P. 145–156.
- Colombo S. Spatial Economics Volume I. Springer, 2020. 365 p.
- Fedyanin A.A., Grunin A.A., Karasev O.I., Krivtsova A.O., Mikhailenko D.A., Petrova T.A. Transport complex development index. Analytical report. Moscow State University. Moscow, 2020. 116 p. (in Russian).
- Karpik A.P., Lisitsky D.V. Prospects for the development of geodetic and cartographic production and a new paradigm of geospatial activity. Bulletin of SGUGiT. 2020. V. 25. No. 2. P. 19–29 (in Russian).
- Karpik A., Lisitsky D., Osipov A., Savinykh V. New paradigm of geoinformation space in territorial aspect. Revista TURISMO: Estudos e Práticas. 2020. No. 1. Mode of access: http://natal.uern.br/periodicos/index.php/RTEP/article/view/544.
- Kryukov V.A., Baranov A.O., Pavlov V.N., Suslov V.I., Suslov N.I. Problems of development of a single complex of means of macroeconomic interregional intersectoral analysis and forecasting. Economy of the region. 2020. V. 16. No. 4. P. 1072–1086. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-5 (in Russian).
- Lavrinenko P.A., Romashina A.A., Stepanov P.S., Chistyakov P.A. Transport accessibility as an indicator of the development of the region. Forecasting problems. 2019. No. 6. P. 136–146 (in Russian).
- Rietveld P., Shefer D. Regional development in an age of structural economic change. Routledge, 2019. 267 p.
- Rubanov I.N. Description of the methodology for the development of integral indicators for assessing the properties of spatial objects and analysis of typical research errors (on the example of indicators of sustainable development and regions of Russia). Materials of the International Conference “InterCarto. InterGIS”. 2019. V. 25. Part 1. P. 5–17. http://intercarto.msu.ru/jour/articles/article655.pdf (in Russian).
- Sakharov V., Chernyi S., Saburov S., Chertkov A. Automatization Search for the Shortest Routes in the Transport Network Using the Floyd-Warshell Algorithm. Transportation Research procedia. 2021. V. 54. P. 1–11.
- Sakharov V.V., Sikarev I.A., Chertkov A.A. Automation of the search for optimal routes and cargo flows in transport networks by means of integer linear programming. Bulletin of the State University of Maritime and River Fleet named after Admiral So Makarov. 2018. V. 10. No. 3. P. 647–657. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2018-10-3-647-657 (in Russian).
- Smirnov S.V. Investigation of the possibilities of using algorithms for determining the shortest path in GIS. Topical issues of modern science: theory, methodology, practice, innovation, 2020. P. 56–61 (in Russian).
For citation: Karpik A.P., Lisitsky D.V., Osipov A.G., Savinykh V.N. Geo-cognitive methods of providing analysis and forecasting of socio-economic development of territories. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2021. V. 27. Part 2. P. 128–140. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-2-27-128-140 (in Russian)