Methodical framework for developing interactive web maps based on the example of Struve Geodetic Arc UNESCO World Heritage Site

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-228-241

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Martin R. Manerov

Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences, Department of Regional Policy and Political Geography,
Universitetskaya quay, 7-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia,
E-mail: manerov97@yandex.ru

Arseniy A. Syuzyumov

Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences, Department of Cartography and Geoinformatics,
Universitetskaya quay, 7-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia,
E-mail: syuzyumov.senya@yandex.ru

Sergey V. Tyurin

Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences, Department of Cartography and Geoinformatics,
Universitetskaya quay, 7-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia,
E-mail: s.tjurin@spbu.ru

Abstract

Today, interactive maps are gaining popularity and are used by both specialists and ordinary users in various fields of science and technology. However, the development of the theoretical base of web cartography and the development of interactive maps lags significantly behind the practical component. Moreover, a systematization of the principles of user-centered design in the field of web mapping is necessary. The aim of this work is to create a methodical framework that can be universal for most interactive web map development projects. The creation of the framework is based on the established scheme of interactive web maps development, the ideas of user-oriented design, as well as on the personal experience of the authors in the development of interactive web maps.

The methodical framework covers the following aspects: the need for interactivity of web maps, accessibility on various devices, the dimensional aspect of a map, data structuring, the choice of elements of interaction, the need of usage of third-party maps, multilinguality, the ability to upload user-generated content, the need to create animations, and the choice of the base software. The developed framework helps to form the determining part of the conception of an interactive web map, which is a fundamental step in the proposed process of a web map development. Moreover, the framework facilitates the process of creating interactive web maps and opens up new possibilities and development methods for specialists in web cartography.

The authors, using the interactive web map dedicated to the World Heritage Site “Struve Geodetic Arc”, which was developed by them, as an example, clearly demonstrated the conceptual development process based on the methodical framework.

The terminology is considered and a new definition of an interactive web map is given.

Keywords

web cartography, interactive map, Struve Geodetic Arc, World Heritage, web design

References

  1. Bogdanov A.S., Kaptsyug V.B. International event on the Struve geodetic arc. Geoprofi, 2007. No 3. P. 65–66 (in Russian).
  2. Crampton J.W. Interactivity types in geographic visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2002. V. 29. No 2. P. 85–98. DOI: 10.1559/152304002782053314.
  3. Davidson B.D. Cartographic design for mobile devices: A case study using the UW-Madison interactive campus map. Thesis. Master of science (Cartography and geographic information systems). Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2014. 69 p.
  4. Di Pasquale D., Lerario A., Maiellaro N., Scala P.L. Open source interactive map of Albania cultural heritage. IERI Procedia, 2013. V. 4. P. 383–390. DOI: 10.1016/j.ieri.2013.11.055.
  5. Haklay M., Nivala A.M. User-centered design. Interacting with geospatial technologies, 2010. P. 89–106. DOI: 10.1002/9780470689813.
  6. Hart S.M., Homsy G.C. Stories from north of Main: Neighborhood heritage story mapping. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 2020. P. 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/s10761-019-00529-4.
  7. Kaptsyug V.B. Struve arc — the past and the present. Geoprofi, 2009. No 1. P. 63–67 (in Russian).
  8. Lisitsky D.V., Kikin P.M. Methodological base of web-mapping. Proceedings of the Higher Educational Institutions. Izvestia vuzov “Geodesy and aerophotosurveying”, 2014. No S4. P. 85—91 (in Russian, abs English).
  9. Manerov M.R., Syuzyumov A.A. “Developing an interactive map “Struve geodetic arc UNESCO world heritage site””. Materials of the international scientific-practical conference of students, graduate students and young scientists “Theory and practice of modern geographical research”, dedicated to the 180th anniversary of the Russian traveler and naturalist, Central Asian researcher N.M. Przhevalsky in the framework of the XV Big geographical festival. Moscow: Calligrapher, 2019. P. 616–621. Web resource: https://vk.com/doc134098686_507607741?hash=9b1efaec0d6220f1f7&dl=6a06b9a5623620d565 (accessed 23.12.2019) (in Russian, abs English).
  10. Miao R., Song J., Zhu Y. 3D geographic scenes visualization based on WebGL. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on agro-geoinformatics. Fairfax, Virginia, USA, 2017. IEEE, 2017. P. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/Agro-Geoinformatics.2017.8046999.
  11. Miller C.C. A beast in the field: the Google maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 2006. V. 41. No 3. P. 187–199. DOI: 10.3138/J0L0-5301-2262-N779.
  12. Robinson A.C., Chen J., Lengerich E.J., Meyer H.G., MacEachren A.M. Combining usability techniques to design geovisualization tools for epidemiology. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2005. V. 32. No 4. P. 243–255. DOI: 10.1559/152304005775194700.
  13. Roth R.E. Cartographic interaction primitives: framework and synthesis. The Cartographic Journal, 2012. V. 49. No 4. P. 376–395. DOI: 10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019.
  14. Roth R.E. Interactive maps: what we know and what we need to know. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2013. V. 2013. No 6. P. 59–115. DOI: 10.5311/josis.v0i6.105.
  15. Roth R.E. Interactivity and cartography: A contemporary perspective on user interface and user experience design from geospatial professionals. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 2015. V. 50. No 2. P. 94–115. DOI: 10.3138/cart.50.2.2427.
  16. Roth R.E., Harrower M. Addressing map interface usability: learning from the lakeshore nature preserve interactive map. Cartographic Perspectives, 2008. No 60. P. 46–66. DOI: 10.14714/CP60.231.
  17. Rygalova M.V., Rygalov E.V. Geoinformation technologies in the study of historical and cultural heritage of the museums of the Altai territory. InterCarto. InterGIS. Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2019. V. 25. Part 2. P. 383–389. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2019-2-25-383-389 (in Russian, abs English).
  18. Strelnikova A.V., Eremeeva K.S. The cartographic methods in the digital age: New opportunities to study urban practices. Sociology of City, 2019. No 1. P. 30–41 (in Russian, abs English).
  19. Struve V.Ya. Arc of the meridian: (selected chapters). Moscow: Geodezizdat, 1957. 255 p. (in Russian).
  20. Tolochko R.C. Contemporary professional practices in interactive web map design. Thesis. Master of science (Cartography and geographic information systems). Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2016. 98 p.
  21. Tsou M.H. Revisiting web cartography in the United States: The rise of user-centered design. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2011. V. 38. No 3. P. 250–257. DOI: 10.1559/15230406382250.
  22. Yunusova A.B., Christodulou O.I., Abdullin A.K. Geoinformation technology for islam: on the project to create interactive electronic maps “Islam in the South Urals”. Proceedings of the RAS Ufa Scientific Center, 2015. V. 4. P. 112–115 (in Russian).

For citation: Manerov M.R., Syuzyumov A.A., Tyurin S.V. Methodical framework for developing interactive web maps based on the example of Struve Geodetic Arc UNESCO World Heritage Site. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020. V. 26. Part 4. P. 228–241. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-228-241 (in Russian)