“An interdisciplinary perspective on ecosystem services and human well-being”: results and potentials of German-Russian cooperation within the project

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-80-93

View or download the article (Eng)

About the Authors

Diana Dushkova

Humboldt University of Berlin,
Unter den Linden, 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany;
E-mail: diana.dushkova@geo.hu-berlin.dedagmar.haase@geo.hu-berlin.de

Dagmar Haase

Humboldt University of Berlin,
Unter den Linden, 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany;
E-mail: dagmar.haase@geo.hu-berlin.de

Peer von Döhren

Humboldt University of Berlin,
Unter den Linden, 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany;
E-mail: doehrenp@hu-berlin.de

Olga Chereshnya

Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov,
Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: cherry.purplerain@gmail.com

Vladimir Megorsky

Centre for Human Adaptation in the Arctic of the Kola Science Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences,
Fersman str., 41a, 184209, Apatity, Russia;
E-mail: megorsky@ya.ru

Abstract

Programs of international cooperation between universities and scientific centres aim to promote not only the achievements in science and education but also contribute to intercultural understanding, as well as to development of efficient human resources, research and innovation. The aim of this paper is to explore the potential of international cooperation in research and higher education between Russia and Germany by examining selected German-Russian projects and their outcomes. In particular, it highlights the experience of summer schools on “An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being”, an annual event started in 2014. It is organized under the umbrella of the German Academic Exchange Service (Program of Eastern Partnership), the International Office and Geography Department of Humboldt University of Berlin and the Faculty of Geography at Lomonosov Moscow State University in strong cooperation with other universities, research centres and NGOs from both countries. The summer school addresses relevant contemporary environmental issues of urbanization with special emphasis on ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions and their importance for well-being of the urban population. In this paper we present our experience from this project by providing the theoretical-methodological aspects of such joint educational and training programs and report outcomes, which emerged from them, thereby highlighting the difficulties and advantages and suggest lines of further development and cooperation. It also highlights how geographical perspective can provide new important and critical insights into the place-based approaches to ecosystem assessment and how it relates to the current trends in human-environmental research.

Keywords

international educational programs, ecosystem services, human well-being, Germany, Russia

References

  1. Burkhard B., Petrosillo I., Costanza R. Ecosystem services — bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecological complexity, 2010. V. 7. P. 257–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.07.001.
  2. Craciun D., Bunoiu M. Learning science outside the classroom: a summer school experience. AIP Conference proceedings, 2019. 2071(1):050002. DOI: 10.1063/1.5090086.
  3. Döhren P., Haase D. Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecological indicators, 2015. V. 52. P. 490–497.
  4. Dushkova D., Haase D. The concept of ecosystem services in theory and practice. Study guide for 4th HU-MGU Summer school 2018 “An interdisciplinary perspective on ecosystem services and human well-being”. Berlin: Department of Geography, Humboldt University of Berlin, 2018. 158 p.
  5. Egron-Polak E., Hudson R. Internationalization of higher education: growing expectations. Fundamental values IAU 4th Global Survey, 2014. Web resource: http://www.iau-aiu.net/sites/all/files/IAU-4th-GLOBAL-SURVEY-EXECUTIVESUMMARY.pdf (accessed 10.11.2019).
  6. Elmqvist T., Fragkias M., Goodness J., Güneralp B., Marcotullio P.J., McDonald R.I., Parnell S., Schewenius M., Sendstad M., Seto K.C., Wilkinson C. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. A global assessment. Berlin: Springer, 2013. 755 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1.
  7. Everard M. Ecosystem services: key issues. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2017. 200 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315531816.
  8. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological economics, 2009. V. 68. P. 643–653.
  9. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological complexity, 2010. V. 7. P. 260–272.
  10. Haase D. The importance of ecosystem services for urban areas. Valuation and modelling approaches. UGEC Viewpoints, 2012. V. 7. P. 4–7.
  11. Haase D., Larondelle N., Andersson E., Artmann M., Borgström S., Breuste J., Gomez-Baggethun E., Gren Å., Hamstead Z., Hansen R., Kabisch N., Kremer P., Langemeyer J., Rall E.L., McPhearson T., Pauleit S., Qureshi S., Schwarz N., Voigt A., Wurster D., Elmqvist T. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. AMBIO, 2014. V. 43. P. 413–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
  12. Haase D., Haase A., Rink D., Quanz J. Shrinking cities and ecosystem services: opportunities, planning, challenges, and risks. Atlas of ecosystem services. Berlin: Springer, 2019. P. 271–277. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_42.
  13. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. CICES Version 4: response to consultation. Nottingham: Centre for environmental management, University of Nottingham, 2011. 17 p.
  14. Krasny M.E., Lundholm C., Shava S., Lee E., Kobori H. Urban landscapes as learning arenas for biodiversity and ecosystem services management. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. P. 629–664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_30.
  15. Kudryavtsev A. Urban environmental education and sense of place. PhD dissertation. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, 2012. 250 p.
  16. Lane R., Lucas D., Henry S., Coates I. ‘Committing to place’ at the local scale: the potential of youth education programs for promoting community participation in regional natural resource management. Australian Geographer, 2005. V. 36. P. 351–367.
  17. La Notte A., D’Amato D., Mäkinen H., Paracchini M.L., Liquete C., Egoh B., Geneletti D., Crossman N.D. Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecological indicators, 2017. V. 74. P. 392–402.
  18. Millennium ecosystem assessment (MA). Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005. 137 p.
  19. Mocior E., Kruse M. Educational values and services of ecosystems and landscapes — an overview. Ecological indicators, 2016. V. 60. P. 137–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.031.
  20. Novikova E., Mityagina V., Walter S. University international cooperation: project-based translation training. Higher education in Russia, 2019. V. 28. No 6. P. 75–85. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-6-75-85.
  21. Obst D., Buck Sutton S. The changing landscape of international partnerships. Developing strategic international partnerships models for initiating and sustaining innovative institutional linkage. New York: Institute of International Education, 2011. P. 13–23.
  22. Potschin M.B., Haines-Young R.H. Ecosystem services. Progress in physical geography, 2011. V. 35. No 5. P. 575–594. DOI: 10.1177/0309133311423172.
  23. Rendón O.R., Garbutt A., Skov M. A framework linking ecosystem services and human well-being: saltmarsh as a case study. People and nature, 2019. V. 1. P. 486–496. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10050.
  24. Schenone C., Brunenghi M.M., Pittaluga I., Hajar A., Kamali W., Montaresi F., Rasheed M., Wahab A.A., El Moghrabi Y., Manasrah R. Managing European cross border cooperation projects on sustainability: a focus on an MESP Project. Sustainability, 2017. V. 9. No 1. 112. DOI: 10.3390/su9010112.
  25. Steger C., Hirsh S., Evers C., Branoff B., Petrova M., Nielsen-Pincus M., Wardropper C., van Riper C.J. Ecosystem services as boundary objects for transdisciplinary collaboration. Ecological economics, 2018. V. 143. P. 153–160.
  26. Stevenson R.B., Brody M., Dillon J., Wals A.E.J. International handbook of research on environmental education. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2012. 592 p.
  27. Stöhler C. Projektmanagement im Studium. Vom Projektarbeit bis zur Abschlusspräsentation [Project management in study process — from work on the project to final presentation]. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2016. 152 p.
  28. Strategic framework — education and training 2020. Web resource: http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009XG0528(01) (accessed 30.10. 2019).
  29. Terhart E. Interdisciplinary research on education and its disciplines: processes of change and lines of conflict in unstable academic expert cultures: Germany as an example. European educational research journal, 2017. V. 16. No 6. P. 921–936.

For citation: Dushkova D., Haase D., von Döhren P., Chereshnya O., Megorsky V. “An interdisciplinary perspective on ecosystem services and human well-being”: results and potentials of German-Russian cooperation within the project. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020. V. 26. Part 1. P. 80–93. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-1-26-80-93