View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Natalya V. Krutskikh

Institute of Geology of Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Pushkinskaya str., 11, 185910, Petrozavodsk, Russia,

Viktor L. Mironov

Institute of Geology of Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Pushkinskaya str., 11, 185910, Petrozavodsk, Russia,

Pavel A. Ryazantsev

Institute of Geology of Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Pushkinskaya str., 11, 185910, Petrozavodsk, Russia,


GIS and satellite images are efficiently used at the initial stage of mire studies. Multi-spectral satellite images are used to analyze the spatial structure of various microlandscapes and reveal the main heterogeneities of mires. Two perilacustrine mires, Shuiyskie Plavni and Ravdukorbi, located in the Onega Lake basin, are discussed in the present paper. They are considered as natural flood plain mires. Occurring on them are three groups of biotopes: dominantly superaquatic, moderately superaquatic and short-time superaquatic. The vegetation coverof Shuiskie Plavni Mire consists of eutrophic communities, forming several consecutive belts composed of bog-grass, willow-motley grass, motley grass, sedge, reed and cane black alder and birch forests. The plant cover at the open sites of Ravdukorbi Mire is dominated by sedge-marsh cinquefoil, willow-marsh cinquefoil and grass-dwarf shrub-sphagnum communities and at the forest sites by bog-grass birch stands, mesoeutrophic bogbean-sphagnum pine stands and mesooligotrophic pine-dwarf shrub-sphagnum communities. As both mires adjoin lakes with a large specific watershed, they are regularly flooded in spring. As a result, the vegetation and geochemical indices are affected. Satellite images are deciphered basically using Landsat 8 space survey data. Images were processed thematically using rasters created by calculating the spectral indices NDVI, NDMI, the iron oxide index and the underlying surface index. Non-controlled classification of mire areas, conducted by analyzing major components, showed considerable similarity to the results of field studies. The data obtained will be used to continue mire studies, to construct a trail network and to update current research methods.


remote sensing, wetland complexes, geophysical studies.


  1. Alekseeva M.N., Preys Yu. I., Diukarev E.A. Spatial structure of vegetation cover and top layer of peat of northeastern spurs of the Great Vasyugan mire by remote and ground data. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2015. V. 326, No 4. P. 8–90 (in Russian).
  2. Ardashnikova S. Wetland microlandscape mapping based on spectral classification of RapidEye images. Geomatics. 2015. No 2(27). P. 46–51 (in Russian).
  3. Carlson T.N., Ripley D.A. On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover and leaf area index. Remote Sensing of Environment. 1997. V. 62. P. 241–252.
  4. Diukarev E.A., Pologova N.N., Golovatckaya E.A. Spatial Structure of Forest-Mire Complexes at the Key Site “Bakcharsky”. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies. 2008. V. 1, No 4. P. 334–345 (in Russian).
  5. Grishchenko M.Y., Butorina S.A. Eevaluation of the thermal infrared satellite images appliance for vegetation interpretation (case study of Bering and Kunashir islands). Proceedings of the International conference InterCarto. InterGIS. 2017. No 23 (3). P. 71–81 (in Russian). DOI:10.24057/2414-9179-2017-3-23-71-81.
  6. Kazakov A.A. Remote geothermal mapping of bogs of Western Siberia (by the example of the Tarman swamp massif). Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Ecology and nature management. 2013. No 4. P. 161–167 (in Russian).
  7. Kearney M.S., Rogers A.S. Forecasting sites of future coastal marsh loss using topographical relationships and logistic regression. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 2010. P. 449–461.
  8. Kutenkov S.A., Mironov V.L. Plant communities and peat deposit peculiarities of Ravdukorbi floodplain mire. Scientific notes of Petrozavodsk State University. Biological Sciences. 2015. No 6. P. 40–47 (in Russian).
  9. Mironov V.L. Plant cover and dynamics of Logmozero limnogenous mire (South Karelia). Izvestiya of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2012. V. 14, No 1 (5). P. 1324–1327 (in Russian).
  10. Segal D. Theoretical Basis for Differentiation of Ferric-Iron Bearing Minerals, Using Landsat MSS Data. Proceedings of Symposium for Remote Sensing of Environment, 2nd Thematic Conference on Remote Sensing for Exploratory Geology, Fort Worth, TX, 1982. P. 949–951.
  11. Skakun R.S., Wulder M.A., Franklin S.E. Sensitivity of the thematic mapper enhanced wetness difference index to detect mountain pine beetle red-attack damage. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2003. V. 86. P. 433–443.
  12. Wilson E.H., Sader S.A. Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2002. P. 385–396.
  13. Zubkov I.A. The algorithms of unsupervised classification in remote-sensing data processing. Modern problems of remote sensing of the earth from space. 2007. V. 4, No 1. Р. 57–62 (in Russian).

For citation: Krutskikh N.V., Mironov V.L., Ryazantsev P.A. THE USE OF GIS-TECHNOLOGIES FOR MIRE STUDIES Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS”. 2018;24(1):405–418