THE REGIONAL ASPECT OF USING GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AT THE STAGE OF INCREASING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF ENGINEERING-PREPARED TERRITORIES

https://doi.org/10.24057/2414-9179-2017-1-23-355-364

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

A. V. Volkov

St. Petersburg State Architectural-Construction University
Russian Federation
4, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya st, St. Petersburg, 190005

A. M. Polikarpov

St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034

T. A. Aliev

St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034

T. A. Zabolotskaya

St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034

A. V. Shepeleva

St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034

V. V. Zasyad’-Volk

St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034

S. N. Maksimov

St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034

Abstract

This paper highlights the advantages of geoinformation technologies using in the formation of perspective land plots for construction to increase the investment attractiveness of engineering prepared territories. It discusses the formation of land plots, which were prepared for placement of new enterprises, their legal registration and the necessary infrastructure. It analyzes the approaches to pricing prepared land plots in the market, as well as their demand among investors for major investment projects in the construction sector. The paper describes the characteristics of types of sites for construction, substantiating the creation of a data base for prospective engineering prepared territories.

The emphasis is made on the question of working with a large amount of spatial information being analyzed that dictates the use of GIS technologies for increasing efficiency of interaction of interested parties. The article analyzes the structure of the Federal geographic information system, created to provide electronic interaction at the level of the Federal Executive power, local government bodies, legal persons and individuals.

Geographic information system (GIS) of this level can provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the prepared documents, execution of project agreements of territorial planning and information support for decision for all levels of government in planning of territory development. GIS allow us to operatively evaluate the investment attractiveness of prospective land plots for construction. The use of technologies of collecting and providing information about engineering prepared territories to potential investors improves the investment attractiveness of the Russian Federation on the whole. 

Keywords

geoinformation technologies, engineering-prepared territory, investment attractiveness.

References

  1. Bystrov P.N., Zakirov R.S. K voprosu o redevelopmente promishlennih territoriy v tsentralnoy chasti goroda [The issue of redevelopment of industrial territories in the Central part of the city], Izvestiya KGASU, 2006, No 1 (5), pp. 59–63 (in Russian).
  2. Varshanina T.P. Obshchenauchnye predposylki i perspektivy prognozirovaniya geoprostranstvennyh processov v interesah ustojchivogo razvitiya territorij [General scientific preconditions and prospects of prediction of geospace processes for the benefit of the sustainable development of territories]. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS 22”, 2016, T. 1, pp. 3–13. (in Russian) DOI:10.24057/2414-9179-2016-1-22-3-13.
  3. Volkov S.N., Chepurin E.M. Uchebno-metodicheskoye obyedineniye visshih uchebnih zavedeniy Rossiyskoy Federatsii po obrazovaniyu v oblasti zemleustroystva i kadastrov [Educational-methodical association of higher educational institutions of the Russian Federation on education in the field of land management and cadastres], Zemleustroystvo, kadastr i monitoring zemel, 2013, No. 5 (101), pp. 71–76 (in Russian).
  4. Golovanov E.B., Kiselyova V.A. Razvitiye redevelopmenta kak napravleniya po preobrazovaniyu gorodskih territoriy [The development of the redevelopment, as the direction for the transformation of urban territories], Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Ser. Economika i menedzhment, No. 3, T. 7, 2013 (in Russian).
  5. Zabolotskiy A.A. Sovershenstvovaniye uchebnogo protsessa s pomoschyu geoinformatsionnih tehnologiy pri provedenii polevih uchebnih praktik na territorii UNS “Sablino” [The improvement of the educational process with the help of GIS technologies during field training practices on the territory of educational and scientific station “Sablino”] Vectnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Ser. 7. Geologiya. Geografiya, 2013, Vyp. 4, pp. 175–182 (in Russian).
  6. Kadochnikov A.A. Geoinformacionnye tekhnologii v sisteme “Bank prostranstvennyh dannyh Krasnoyarskogo kraya” [Geoinformational technology in the system “Bank of spatial data Krasnoyarsk Region”]. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS 21”, 2015, pp. 479–484 (in Russian) DOI:10.24057/2414-9179-2015-1-21-479-484.
  7. Lurie I.K., Baldina E.A., Prasolova A.I., Prokhorova E.A., Semin V.N., Tchistov S.V. Sozdanie serii kart ekologo-geograficheskoj ocenki zemel’nyh resursov territorii Novoj Moskvy [Developing a series of maps for ecological and geographical evaluation of land resources of the New Moscow territory]. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS 21”, 2015, pp. 3–12. (in Russian); DOI:10.24057/2414-9179-2015-1-21-3-12.
  8. Myadzelets A.V. Geoinformacionnoe modelirovanie na osnove analiza prostranstvennovremennyh zakonomernostej formirovaniya territorial’noj organizacii na primere regionov Sibiri [Geoinformation mapping based on the analysis of spatial-temporal regularities of territorial organization forming for the case of Siberian regions]. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS 22”, 2016, T. 2 (22), No 80–88 (in Russian); DOI:10.24057/2414-9179-2016-2-22-80-88.
  9. Shayapov R.G., Chepurin E.M. Sovremennoye sostoyaniye kartografo-geodezicheskogo obespecheniya strani (kadastroviy i zemleustroitelniy aspekti) [Current state cartographicgeodetic supplying of the country (cadastre and land management aspects)], Materiali mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Zemleustroystvo i kadastr nedvizhimosti v realizatsii gosudarstvennoy zemelnoy politiki i ohrani okruzhayuschey sredi”, 2009, pp. 404–409 (in Russian).
  10. Shepeleva A.V., Zasyad-Volk V.V., Maksimov S.N., Aliev T.A., Zabolotskaya T.A. Uchyot ekologicheskih faktorov v kadastre nedvizhimosti dlya celej upravleniya ustojchivym razvitiem urbanizirovannyh territorij [Registration of ecological factors in the real estate cadaster for the purposes of management by sustainable development of urban territories]. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS 22”, 2016, T 2, pp. 244–255 (in Russian); DOI:10.24057/2414-9179-2016-2-22-244-255.
  11. Chumachenko A.N., Khvorostukhin D.P., Danilov V.A., Gusev V.A. Struktura kartograficheskoj bazy dannyh dlya resheniya zadach po ocenke indeksa ustojchivogo razvitiya municipal’nyh raj’onov Saratovskoj oblasti [Structure of cartographic database for solving Saratov region municipal districts sustainable development index assesment tasks]. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS 21”, 2015, pp. 179–184 (in Russian); DOI:10.24057/2414-9179-2015-1-21-179-184.
  12. Batista e Silva F., Lavalle C., Koomen E. A procedure to obtain a refined European land use/cover map, Journal of Land Use Science, 2013, No 8 (3), pp. 255–283; DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2012.667450.
  13. Blistan P., Kovanic L., Kovanicova M. The Importance of Geographic Information Systems Education at Universities in the Process of Building a European Knowledge-based Society, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 191, 2 June 2015, pp. 2458–2462; DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.358.
  14. Day J., Chen Y., Ellis P., Roberts M. A free, open-source tool for identifying urban agglomerations using polygon data, Environment Systems and Decisions, 2017, No 37 (1), pp. 68–87; DOI: 10.1007/s10669-017-9623-z.
  15. Ehrlich D., Pesaresi M. Do we need a global human settlement analysis system based on satellite imagery, Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event, JURSE, 2013, 6550668, pp. 69–73, DOI: 10.1109/JURSE#.2013.6550668.
  16. Freire S., Florczyk A., Ehrlich D., Pesaresi M. Remote sensing derived continental high resolution built-up and population geoinformation for crisis management, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). November, 2015, 7326364, pp. 2677–2679. DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326364.
  17. Gueguen L., Pesaresi M., Ehrlich D., Lu L., Guo H. Urbanization detection by a region based mixed information change analysis between built-up indicators, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2013, No 6 (6), 6472119, pp. 2410–2420; DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2246547.
  18. Pesaresi M., Ehrlich D., Florczyk A.J., Freire S., Julea A., Kemper T., Syrris V. The global human settlement layer from landsat imagery, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), November, 2016, 7730897, pp. 7276–7279; DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7730897.

For citation: Volkov A.V., Polikarpov A.M., Aliev T.A., Zabolotskaya T.A., Shepeleva A.V., Zasyad’-Volk V.V., Maksimov S.N. THE REGIONAL ASPECT OF USING GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AT THE STAGE OF INCREASING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF ENGINEERING-PREPARED TERRITORIES. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS”. 2017;23(1):355-364. https://doi.org/10.24057/2414-9179-2017-1-23-355-364