View or download the article (Rus)

About the Author

Jean A. Doumit

Lebanese university, department of geography, Beirut, Lebanon


The Soil and Terrain digital database (SOTER) stores attribute data on landform and soils, the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) create a soil and terrain digital database with a global coverage at a spatial resolution of one kilometer approximately. For a little country as Lebanon such data with a very low resolution cannot be useful, Until recently, only manual methods were used to delineate SOTER (SOil and TERrain Digital Database) Units [21]. Theaimofourstudyisto apply aquantitativemethodtoderive terrain classes that match the physiography SOTER of the Lebanese territory at regional scale. According to SRTMdigital elevation model todefinetheSOTERTerrainUnit: hypsometry, slope, reliefintensity and stream density. Several GIS techniques were employed to translate the SOTER mapping concept. The four features are combined and vectorized to achieve the delineation of the SOTER Terrain unit’s map at a spatial precision of 90 meters.


Lebanon, soil, United Nations Environmental Program, GIS, mapping.


  1. Batjes N.H., A taxotransfer rule-based approach for filling gaps in measured soil data in primary SOTER databases, version 1.0. Technical report 03, ISRIC World Soil Information, Wageningen. – 2003.
  2. Batjes N.H., SOTER summary file for Central and Eastern Europe (SOVEUR Project), version1.0. ISRIC Report 06, ISRIC, Wageningen. – 2000.
  3. Baumgardner M.F., World Soils and Terrain Digital Database at a scale of 1:1M (SOTER). ISSS, Wageningen Carson B, Shah PB and Maharjan PB 1986.// Land Systems Report, the soil landscapes of Nepal, HMG of Nepal Land Resource Mapping Project carried out by Kenting Earth Sciences Limited, Kathmandu, Nepal. – 1986.
  4. Burrough P., McDonnell R. Principles of Geographic Information Systems. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, – 1998, – 333 p.
  5. Carter J. The Effect of Data Precision on the Calculation of Slope And Aspect Using Gridded DEMs. //Cartographica, – Vol. 29, – №. 1, – 1992, – pp. 22–34.
  6. Chang K., Tsai B. The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping.//Cartography and GIS, – №18(1), – 1991, – pp. 69–77.
  7. Chorley R.J., Morgan M. A., Comparison of morphometric features, Unaka Mountains, Tennessee and North Carolina, and Dartmoor,England:Geol.Soc.Am.Bull., – v.73, – 1962, – pp.17–34.
  8. Dijkshoorn J.A., van Engelen V.WP and Huting JRM. Soil and landform properties for LADA partner countries (Argentina, China, Cuba, Senegal and Gambia, South Africa and Tunisia), ISRIC- World Soil Information, Wageningen. – 2008.
  9. Dobos E., Daroussin J., Montanarella L. A quantitative procedure for building physiographic units for the European SOTER database. In ‘Digital Terrain Modelling.// Development and Applications in a Policy Support Environment, European Commission, Springer. – 2007, – pp.227–259.
  10. Dobos E., Micheli E., Baumgardner M.F., Biehl L., Helt T. Use of combined digital elevation model and satellite radiometric data for regional soil mapping. //Geoderma. 97, – 2000, – pp.367–391.
  11. Dobos E., Montanarella L. The development of a quantitative procedure for soilscape delineation using digital elevation data for Europe. //Digital Soil Mapping workshop, Montpellier, France, – 2004, – pp. 14–17.
  12. Evans I. S. General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude, and descriptive statistics // Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology. L., – 1972.
  13. Falorni G., Teles V., Vivoni E.R., Bras R.L., Amaratunga K., Analysis and characterization of the vertical accuracy of digital elevation models from the shuttle radar topography mission. //Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, F02005. – 2005.
  14. FAO and UNEP //Land Degradation Assessments for Drylands, FAO 2007.
  15. FAO, AGL Global Soil and Terrain Database (WORLD-SOTER), The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/soter.stm)
  16. FAO, ISRIC and National Institutes. //Soil and Terrain database for Central and Eastern Europe, version 1.0, FAO Rome 2000.
  17. FAO, ISRIC and UNEP //Soil and Terrain Database for Southern Africa, version1.0, FAO Rome 2003.
  18. FAO, ISRIC and Universiteit Gent. //Soil and Terrain Database for Central Africa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, FAO Rome 2007.
  19. FAO, ISRIC, UNEP and CIP. //Soil and Terrain database for Latin America and the Caribbean, CDROM, FAO Rome 1998.
  20. Gamba P., DellAcqua F., Houshmand B., SRTM data characterization in urban areas.//International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Commission III,Symposium 2002.
  21. Gardinier V., Gregory K.J. Drainage density in rainfall-runoff modelling in Rainfall-runoff relationship, //Water Resources Publications. V.P. Singh (ed), 449 76.Littleton, colo, – 1982.
  22. Green P.J., and Sibson R. 1978. Computing dirichlet tesselation in the plane. //The Computer Journal 21, – pp.168–173.
  23. Guth P., 2003. Geomorphology of DEMs: Quality assessment and scale effects. //Proceedings of GSA, Seattle Annual Meeting, pp. 175–2, – 2003.
  24. Hammond E. H., Small scale continental landform maps. //Annals of Association of American Geographers, – 44, – 1954, – pp. 33–42.
  25. Horton R.E. Drainage basin characteristics // Transaction of American Geological Union, – 13, – 1932, – pp. 350–351.
  26. Horton R.E. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basin. // hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., – 56, – 1945, – pp. 275–370.
  27. ISRIC, FAO and Ghent University.// Soil and Terrain database for Central Africa, FAO Land and Water Digital Media Series 33. FAO, Rome 2006.
  28. ISRIC, Global and National Soils and Terrain Databases (SOTER): //Procedures Manual. UNEP-ISSSISRIC-FAO, Int. Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 1993.
  29. ISRIC. SOTER database for LADA partners countries, 2009. (http://www.isric.org/UK/About+Soils/Soil+data/Geographic+data/National/default.htm)
  30. ISSS, ISRIC and FAO.// World Reference Base for Soil Resources, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Nelson D, Laban P, Shrestha BD and Kandel GP 1980. A Reconnaissance Inventory of the Major Ecological Land Units and their Watershed Conditions in Nepal- Summary Report. FO: DP/NEP/74/020, FAO, HMG of Nepal and UNEP Rome 1998.
  31. ISSS. //Proceedings of an International Workshop on the Structure of a Digital International Soil Resources Map annex Database. In: Baumgardner M and L Oldeman, (editors), International Workshop on the Structure of a Digital International Soil Resources Map annex Database. SOTER Report 1. ISSS, Wageningen. – 1986, – 138 p.
  32. Kellndorfer J.,WalkerW., Pierce L., Dobson C., Fites J. A., Hunsaker C., et al., Vegetation height estimation from shuttle radar topography mission and national elevation datasets. //Remote sensing of Environment, – 93, – 2004, – pp.339−358.
  33. McCullagh M. J., Ross C. J. Delaunay trianglulation of a random data set for isarithmic mapping.//The Cartographic Journal 17, – 1980, – pp. 93–99.
  34. McKenna D. G. The inward spiral method: an improved TIN generation technique and data structure for land planning applications. //Proc. Auto-Carto 8, – 1987, – pp. 670–679.
  35. Pearson R. N. Physical geography. Barnes and Noble, New York, NY, – 1968, – 242p.
  36. Peucker T. K., Douglas D. H.Detection of surface specific points by local parallel processing of discrete terrain elevation data. //Computer Graphics and Image Processing 4, – 1974, – pp. 375–387.
  37. Pogorelov A.V., Doumit J.A., Classification and allocation of the discrete morphological elements of the digital elevation model //Actual problems of ecology and conservation of ecosystems of southern regions of Russia and adjacent areas: Proceedings of the twentieth inter-republic scientific-practical conference. – Krasnodar: Kuban State University, – 2008, – p.107–109.
  38. Scarlatos L.L. An automated critical line detector for digital elevation matrices. //Proc. Auto-Carto 9, – 1989, – pp. 146–155.
  39. Schumm S. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badland at Perth Amboy, New Jersey.//Bulletin of Geological Society of America,67, – 1956, – pp 597–646.
  40. Spiridonov A.I. Geomorphological cartography. M. Nedra, – 1975, –184 p.
  41. Stock J. D., Bellugi D., Dietrich W. E., Allen D., Comparison of SRTM topography to USGS and high resolution laser altimetry topography in steep landscapes: Case studies from Oregon and California. //Eos Trans. AGU, Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract H21G-09, –№ 83, – 2002, – p.47
  42. Strahler A.N. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks.// In Handbook of Applied Hydrology, edited by V.T. Chow, 4-39/4-76. McGraw-Hill, New York, – 1964.
  43. Swanston D.N., Dyrness C.T. Stability of steep land. //J. Forest. – 71, – 1973, – pp.264–269.
  44. Turner L.M. Factors influencing the rate of growth of pine in Arkansas.// Ecology 17, – 1936. – pp. 227–240.
  45. Turner L.M. Growth of second-growth pine on the coastal plain soils of Arkansas. Arkansas Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 342. Fayetteville, AK, – 1937, – 52 p.
  46. Turner L.M. Some profile characteristics of the pine-growing soils of the coastal plain region of Arkansas. Arkansas Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 361. Fayetteville, AK, – 1938, – 52p.
  47. Van Engelen VWP and Wen TT// Global and National Soil and Terrain Digital Database (SOTER). Procedures Manual. ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen. – 1995.
  48. Van Engelen VWP, Wen TT. Global and National Soil and Terrain Digital Database (SOTER). Procedures Manual. ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen. – 1995.
  49. Verstappen H.T. Applied geomorphology. Elsevier Science Publishing Co. New York, NY, 1983, – 437 p.
  50. Way D.S. Terrain analysis: a guide to site selection using aerial photographic interpretation. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross Inc., Stroudsburg, PA, – 1973, – 392 p.
  51. Worstell B. Development of soil terrain (SOTER) map units using digital elevation models (DEM) and ancillary digital data. M.Sc. Thesis. Purdue University, Indiana, USA. – 2000.

For citation: Doumit J. LEBANESE SOIL AND TERRAIN UNITES DELINEATION BASED ON DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS. Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS”. 2015;21(1):112-118. https://doi.org/10.24057/2414-9179-2015-1-21-112-118