Methodology for definition of boundaries of Saint Petersburg watersheds to determine the intake of total nitrogen and phosphorus into the Neva Bay and eastern part of the Finnish Gulf

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2023-1-29-304-317

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Stepan М. Klubov

Russian State Hydrometeorological University, Faculty of Ecology,
11, Rizhsky ave., St. Petersburg, Russia, 190103,

Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences,
33–35, 10th line of Vasilyevsky island, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia,

3 State budgetary institution of additional education, Palace of Child Youth Art “At the Voznesensky Bridge” of the Admiralteysky district,
26, Grazhdanskaya str., St. Petersburg, 190031, Russia,

E-mail: klubov_stepan@mail.ru

Victor Yu. Tretyakov

Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences,
33–35, 10th line of Vasilyevsky island, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia,
E-mail: v_yu_tretyakov@mail.ru

Vasily V. Dmitriev

Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences,
33–35, 10th line of Vasilyevsky island, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia,
E-mail: v.dmitriev@spbu.ru

Anna R. Nikulina

Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences,
33–35, 10th line of Vasilyevsky island, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia,
E-mail: st075731@student.spbu.ru

Abstract

The Neva Bay and eastern part of the Finnish Gulf are affected by toxic contamination and eutrophication due to superfluous anthropogenic income of total nitrogen and phosphorus. Monitoring of the total nitrogen and phosphorus content within Saint Petersburg is carried out only in the Neva River and its spill-streams. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate modules of the total nitrogen and phosphorus outflow from watersheds of the watercourses without monitoring river stations. For this reason, it is necessary to definite boundaries of the watersheds. The paper presents proprietary technology for the watershed boundary definition within Saint Petersburg and its outskirts. The methodology is based on usage of the digital terrain model, which was created as result of topographic maps digitalization. Usage of the most popular global digital terrain models such as SRTM, ASTER GDEM makes difficulties under the conditions of big cities. The models were developed on the basis of remote sensing of the Earth’s surface. Therefore, the values have distortions due to the signal reflection from roofs, structures, trees, scrubs, and so on. Thus, the global models include noisy data. The distortions can lead to mistakes at definition of watershed boundary. Topographic maps digitalization allows elaborating of digital terrain models without distortions of altitude values. We have made the new digital terrain model of Saint Petersburg and the outskirts by means of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad Region topographic map digitalization. The map was published in 2001. Its scale is equal to 1:200 000. The feature point layer of the altitudes in the Baltic system was created on the base of the map. The digital terrain model was created in ArcGIS by universal kriging interpolation. Dimension of the model cell side is equal to 100 meters. Definition of the watersheds boundaries was carried out by means of the ArcGIS tool Watershed. In addition, we use for the definition some tools of QGIS and SAGA.

Keywords

digital terrain model, definition of watershed boundaries, satellite images

References

  1. Frumin G.T., Gildeeva I.M. Eutrophication of water bodies—a global environmental problem, Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 2014. V. 84. No. 13. P. 2483–2488. DOI: 10.1134/ S107036321413001.
  2. HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan. HELCOM Ministerial Meeting. Krakow, Poland, 15 November 2007. 101 p.
  3. Kosov Yu.V., Gribanova G.I. The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Problems and prospects of international cooperation. Baltic Region, 2016. V. 8. No. 2. P. 48–66 (in Russian).
  4. Lachininskii S.S., Semenova I.V. Positioning of the world seaside city of St. Petersburg in the Baltic Region. Baltic Region, 2015. V. 25. No. 3. P. 62–75 (in Russian).
  5. Maltsev K.A., Golosov V.N., Gafurov A.M. Digital relief models and their use in calculating the rate of soil flushing on arable land. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye Nauki (Proceedings of Kazan University. Natural Sciences Series), 2018. V. 160. No. 3. P. 514–530 (in Russian).
  6. Mosin O.V. The main environmental problems of the Baltic Sea and ways to solve them. Baltic Region, 2011. V. 7. No. 1. P. 41–53 (in Russian).
  7. Nezhihovsky R.A. Neva River and Neva Bay. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat, 1981. 84 p. (in Russian).
  8. Potapova T.M., Dzhinoridze E.N., Koroleva V.P., Bogdanov V.L., Shmeleva I.V. New information on the development of eutrophication processes in the littoral zone of the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University, 2005. Ser. 7. Iss. 4. P. 76–86 (in Russian).
  9. Riegler G., Hennig S.D., Weber M. WORLDDEM—a novel global foundation layer. Proceedings of Joint ISPRS conference, 2015. V. XL-3/W2. P. 183–187. DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W2-183-2015.
  10. Serebritsky I.A., Grigoriev I.A. Environmental protection, nature management and environmental safety in St. Petersburg. Saint-Petersburg: Sesame Print, 2018. 448 p.
  11. Stepanova E.V., Frumin G.T. Background nitrogen concentrations in the unmonitored and partially monitored rivers of the Gulf of Finland basin. Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 2014. V. 84. No. 13. P. 2592–2595. DOI: 10.1134/S1070363214130167.

For citation: Klubov S.М, Tretyakov V.Yu., Dmitriev V.V., Nikulina A.R. Methodology for definition of boundaries of Saint Petersburg watersheds to determine the intake of total nitrogen and phosphorus into the Neva Bay and eastern part of the Finnish Gulf. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2023. V. 29. Part 1. P. 304–317. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2023-1-29-304-317 (in Russian)