Mapping of the geological and geomorphologic basement of landscapes under the level structure of relief for managing environmental risks within the southern cryolithozone

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-78-90

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Author

Alexey A. Medvedkov

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography,
Leninskie Gory 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia;
E-mail: a-medvedkov@bk.ru

Abstract

The article considers the experience of large-scale mapping of the geological and geomorphological framework of landscapes, taking into account the layered structure of the relief. The key study site represented a 25 km² area, in the northern part of the Yenisei Ridge. This territory is located in the southern cryolithozone. In the course of field work, over a dozen transects were established. They reflected various structural levels of the relief, i.e., the products of its cyclic development. Surface deposits were studied using borehole cores, occasional natural outcrops, and soil pits. These data were supplemented with extrapolations from the analogous areas of the Yenisei Ridge. The collected material on relief features provided the basis for the development of landscape subdivisions’ hierarchy applicable for landscape mapping of territories with leveled denudation relief: the Yenisei Ridge, the west of the Central Siberian Plateau, and other regions with a similar history of development. The compiled map’s legend reflects the relief stratification and the main features of cover sediments. Two levels of planation surface and a complex of surfaces with superimposed planation and differentiation (three different landscapes) were identified. Periglacial processes in the Neo-Pleistocene (Q₂₋₃) glacial epochs and partially in the Holocene (Q₄) played the key role in the formation of the sedimentary cover. The main types of periglacial formations, wide spread within the study territory, were identified and included eluvial-desorption deposits (on summit areas), solifluction-desorption deposits (on slopes and ravine floors), and colluvium-alluvial deposits (on glacis floodplains). We have demonstrated that these types of surface deposits have differentiated influence on the distribution of permafrost geosystems. Analysis of the data on genesis of cover sediments and their relation to relief allowed us to extrapolate the results of the field studies and to map permafrost landscapes—the most susceptible to external impacts natural complexes that require targeted environmental policies.

Keywords

Siberian taiga, permafrost-taiga landscapes, layered relief, periglacial deposits, geomorphological mapping, landscape mapping, mining, landscape protection

References

  1. A complex of remote methods for geological mapping of taiga areas. Methodical manual. Leningrad: Nedra, 1978. 246 p. (in Russian).
  2. Astakhov V.I. Quaternary glaciotectonics of the Ural-Siberian North. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 2019. No. 12. pp. 1353–1367. DOI: 10.15372/RGG2019136.
  3. Development of relief and its stability. Moscow: Nauka, 1993. pp. 17–30. (in Russian).
  4. Fedorov A.N. Permafrost landscapes of Yakutia: allocation methodology and mapping issues. Yakutsk: Institute of Permafrost Studies of the USSR, 1991. 140 p. (in Russian).
  5. Geocryological map of the USSR scale 1:2 500 000. Mingeo USSR, Hydrospetsgeology, MSU. Moscow: GUGK, 1991. 16 p. (in Russian).
  6. Gorshkov S.P. On the genesis and age of the slope blocky-gravelly-loamy deposits of the north of the Yenisei Ridge and the north-west of the Eastern Sayan. Reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1967. V. 172. No. 3. P. 665–668 (in Russian).
  7. Gorshkov S.P., Barkov V.V. The fundamental basis of the legend for analytical geomorphological maps of consolidated areas of demolition of the Yenisei part of Siberia. Geomorphological mapping on a survey scale. Moscow: MSU, 1975. P. 143–152 (in Russian).
  8. Gorshkov S.P., Karrash H., Paramonov A.V. Geomorphological indication of permafrost and non-permafrost landscapes of the middle taiga of Central Siberia. Geomorphology, 1998. No. 4. P. 55–61 (in Russian).
  9. Gorshkov S.P., Vandenberg J., Alekseev B.A., Mochalova O.I., Tishkova M.A. Climate, permafrost and landscapes of the Middle Yenisei region. Moscow: MSU, 2003. 90 p. (in Russian)
  10. Kalinicheva S.V., Fedorov A.N., Zhelezniak M.N. Mapping Mountain Permafrost Landscapes in Siberia Using Landsat Thermal Imagery. Geosciences, 2019. V. 9. No. 1: 4. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences9010004.
  11. Khoroshev A.V. Multi-scale organization of the geographical landscape. Moscow: KMK, 2016. 416 p. (in Russian).
  12. Kornienko S.G. Methodology for assessing the iciness of frozen soils according to remote sensing data in the visible and infrared range. Earth Exploration from Space, 2012. No. 5. P. 75–84. (in Russian).
  13. Krauklis A.A. Problems of experimental landscape studies. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1979. 232 p. (in Russian).
  14. Medvedkov A.A. Experience of landscape-geoecological mapping of the Upper Chapa section (North of the Yenisei Ridge). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2014. No. 1. P. 94-99 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2014-1-94-99.
  15. Medvedkov A.A. Mapping of permafrost landscapes based on the analysis of thermal images. InterCarto. InterGIS, 2016. V. 22. No. 1. P. 380–384 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24057/2414-9179-2016-1-22-380-384.
  16. Medvedkov A.A. Response of middle-taiga permafrost landscapes of Central Siberia to global warming in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2016. V. 48. 012009. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/48/1/012009.
  17. Medvedkov A.A. Geoenvironmental Response of the Yenisei Siberia Mid-Taiga Landscapes to Global Warming during Late XX–Early XXI Centuries. Water Resources, 2015. V. 42. No. 7. P. 922–931. DOI: 10.1134/S0097807815070076.
  18. Medvedkov A.A., Kotova M.V. Fire-Fighting Capability of Forests in Water Protection Zone of Lake Baikal (Case Study of Baikal-Lena Nature Reserve). News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series, 2020. V. 84. No. 5. pp. 764–775 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2587556620050118.
  19. Popov A.I. Permafrost phenomena in the Earth’s crust (cryolithology). Moscow: MSU, 1967. 302 p. (in Russian).
  20. Rakita S.A. Nature and economic development of the North. Moscow: MSU, 1983. 190 p. (in Russian).
  21. Solntsev N.A. The doctrine of landscape: selected works. Moscow: MSU, 2001. 384 p. (in Russian).
  22. Tataurov S.B. Transformation and processing of gold-containing raw materials in the cryolithozone. Moscow: Gornaya kniga, 2008. 318 p. (in Russian).
  23. Viktorov A.S. Landscape drawing. Moscow: Mysl, 1986. 179 p. (in Russian).
  24. Volkov I.A., Krivonogov S.K. Scientific and methodological principles of study and mapping of the geologo-geomorphological basis of landscape. Geology and Geophysics, 1994. V. 35. No. 4. P. 44–49. (in Russian).
  25. Vorobyev I.V., Gorshkov S.P. Periglacial formations of the north of the Yenisei Ridge and the west of the Siberian platform. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 4. Geology, 1975. No. 5. P. 51–59. (in Russian).
  26. Vtyurin B.I. Underground ice of the USSR. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 214 p. (in Russian).

For citation: Medvedkov A.A. Mapping of the geological and geomorphologic basement of landscapes under the level structure of relief for managing environmental risks within the southern cryolithozone. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: MSU, Faculty of Geography, 2022. V. 28. Part 1. P. 78–90. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-78-90 (in Russian)