Metacartography of A. Aslanikashvili and Relational Cartography

DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-343-357

Посмотреть или загрузить статью (Eng)

Об авторах

Viktor S. Chabaniuk

Institute of Geography of NASU,
Volodymyrska str., 44, 01030, Kiev, Ukraine,
E-mail: chab3@i.ua

Leonid G. Rudenko

Institute of Geography of NASU,
Volodymyrska str., 44, 01030, Kiev, Ukraine,
E-mail: l.gr.rudenko@gmail.com

Аннотация

Relational cartography is defined as the coordinated arts, sciences and technologies of making and using relations in cartographic systems and between cartographic systems. It is orthogonal to the paradigms of cartography, which research subject is map. The article describes the influence of A. Aslanikashvili’s metacartography (hereinafter Metacartography) on the main components of relational cartography based on patterns (hereafter Relational Cartography or RelCa) as a science: inquiry domain (research subject), knowledge about the research subject, and methodology for acquisition new knowledge about the research subject. When considering the research subjects, the cases of coincidence of specific spaces of Metacartography and relational spaces and spatial systems of RelCa are described. It is proved that the main influence of Metacartography on knowledge of the RelCa research subject is the cartographic justification of the presence and correctness of epistemological relations in and between cartographic systems (and their originals in actuality). It is shown that the cartographic method of cognition of the Metacartography research subject is the basis of specialized cartographic methods of cognition of RelCa spatial systems.

The main differences between Metacartography and RelCa are the need to extend the RelCa research subject caused by the needs of modern cartographic practice. It leads to the extension of knowledge about the research subject, as well as to the corresponding development of methodology for acquisition new knowledge about the RelCa research subject. It has been suggested that coordinating one of the Subject cartographies with RelCa will allow creation of System Cartography. Such System Cartography will finally be a theory of cartography that will allow cartography to emerge from a constant crisis. In addition, practitioners will receive scientific explanations and justification for the necessary tools to deal with new cartographic phenomena.

Ключ. слова

relational cartography, metacartography, relational space, epistemological relations, cartographic method

Список литературы

  1. Ambler S. An introduction to process patterns. AmbySoft Inc. White Paper, 1998. 18 p.
  2. Aslanikashvili A.F. Cartography. The general theory questions. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1968. 299 p. (in Georgian).
  3. Aslanikashvili A.F. Metacartography. Main problems. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1974. 126 p. (in Russian).
  4. Aslanikashvili A.F. Object and theoretical basis to use cartographic method in geographic research. Proceedings of the Geographical Society of the Georgian SSR, 1973. V. 12 (in Russian).
  5. Aslanikashvili A.F. The cognition subject of geography. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series, 1978. No 2. P. 150–156 (in Russian).
  6. Azócar Fernandez P.I., Buchroithner M.F. Paradigms in cartography: An epistemological review of the 20th and 21st centuries. Springer, 2014. 150 p.
  7. Berlyant A.M. Geoiconics. Moscow: Astrea, 1996. 208 p. (in Russian).
  8. Berlyant A.M. Theory of geoimages. Moscow: GEOS, 2006. 262 p. (in Russian).
  9. Brambilla M., Cabot J., Wimmer M. Model-driven software engineering in practice. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2nd ed., 2017. 209 p.
  10. Bunge W. Theoretical geography: translation from English. Moscow: Progress, 1967. 279 p. (in Russian).
  11. Cauvin C., Escobar F., Serradj A. Thematic cartography. V. 1: Thematic cartography and transformations. ISTE-Wiley, 2010. 512 p.
  12. Chabaniuk V. Relational сartography: theory and practice. Kiev: Institute of Geography of the NAS of Ukraine, 2018. 525 p. (in Ukrainian).
  13. Chabaniuk V., Dyshlyk O. Atlas basemaps in web 2.0 Epoch. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. XXIII ISPRS Congress 12–19 July 2016. Prague, Czech Republic, 2016. V. XLI–B4. P. 611–618.
  14. Chabaniuk V., Rudenko L. Relational geospatial technologies: Background theory, practical example and needs in education, in geospatial technologies in geography education. Geospatial Technologies in Geography Education. Springer, 2019. P. 63–83.
  15. Cresswell T. Geographic thought: A critical introduction (Critical introductions to geography). Wiley–Blackwell, 2013. 298 p.
  16. Falkenberg E.D., Lindgreen P. Information system concepts: An in-depth analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989. 357 p.
  17. Holyoak K.J., Morrison R.G. The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Oxford University Press, 2012. 865 p.
  18. Klir G.J. Architecture of systems problem solving. Springer, 1985. 560 p.
  19. Köbben B. Towards a national atlas of the Netherlands as part of the national spatial data Infrastructure. The Cartographic Journal, 2013. V. 50. No 3. P. 225–231.
  20. Liuty А.А. Language of map. Moscow: Znanie, 1981. 48 p. (in Russian).
  21. Liuty А.А. Language of map: essence, system, functions. Moscow: IG, USSR AS, 1988. 292 p. (in Russian).
  22. Liuty А.А. Language of map: essence, system, functions. Abstract of diss… Doctor of geogr. sc. Kiev, 1989 (in Russian).
  23. Lurie I.K. Geoinformation cartography. Methods of geoinformatics and digital processing of satellite images: A textbook. Moscow: KDU, 2008. 424 p. (in Russian).
  24. Lyashenko D., Kozachenko T. The concept of geoinformation cartography and its evolution. Geoinformation cartography in Ukraine: Conceptual background and directions of evolution. Кiev: Naukova dumka, 2011. P. 15–54 (in Ukrainian).
  25. Miller H.J. The data avalanche is here. Shouldn’t we be digging? Journal of Regional Science, 2010. V. 50. No 1. P. 181–201.
  26. Roth R.E. Interacting with Maps: The science and practice of cartographic interaction. Diss… Doctor of philos. (geogr.) sc. The Pennsylvania State University, 2011. 225 p.
  27. Rudenko L.G. Cartographic substantiation of territorial planning. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1984. 168 p. (in Russian).
  28. Rudenko L.G., Bochkovska A.I., Kozachenko T.I., Parchomenko G.O., Razov V.P., Lyashenko D.O., Chabaniuk V.S. National atlas of Ukraine. Scientific backgrounds of creation and their realization. Кiev: Academperiodics, 2007. 408 p. (in Ukrainian).
  29. Rudenko L.G., Chabaniuk V.S. Foundations of the conception of the multipurpose GIS of Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 1994. No 3. P. 22–34 (in Ukrainain).
  30. Sieber R., Hollenstein L., Odden B., Hurni L. From classic atlas design to collaborative platforms — The SwissAtlasPlatform Project. 25th International cartographic conference. Paris, 2011. 10 p.
  31. Sui D., Holt J. Visualizing and analyzing public-health data using value-by-area cartograms: Toward a new synthetic framework. Cartographica, 2008. V. 43. Iss. 1. P. 3–20.
  32. Van Gigch J.P. System design modeling and metamodeling. Springer, 1991. 453 p.

Для цитирования: Chabaniuk V.S., Rudenko L.G. Metacartography of A. Aslanikashvili and Relational Cartography. ИнтерКарто. ИнтерГИС. Геоинформационное обеспечение устойчивого развития территорий: Материалы Междунар. конф. M: Издательство Московского университета, 2020. Т. 26. Ч. 4. С. 343–357 DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-343-357

For citation: Chabaniuk V.S., Rudenko L.G. Metacartography of A. Aslanikashvili and Relational Cartography. InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020. V. 26. Part 4. P. 343–357. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-343-357