Development of the concept of GIS for research of the aesthetic value of natural landscapes

https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2019-2-25-321-329

View or download the article (Rus)

About the Authors

Marina V. Gribok

Lomonosov Moscow State University,
Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991, Moscow, Russia,
E-mail: gribok.marina@gmail.com

Tatiana Yu. Gorbunova

The A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Marine Biological Research of RAS,
299011, 2 Nakhimov ave., 299011, Sevastopol, Russia,
E-mail: gorbunovatyu@gmail.com

Abstract

The use of GIS technologies opens up extensive opportunities for research on the aesthetic value of landscapes. The aim of this work is to develop a concept and description of the main functions of GIS, designed to support the study of the aesthetic value of natural landscapes. Testing of functions of the projected GIS is carried out on the example of the South-Eastern Crimea, where earlier one of the authors assessed the aesthetic value of landscapes using polling data.

Based on the results of the analysis of stages and the algorithm of their own research, as well as the analysis of other domestic and foreign scientific works on the evaluation of aesthetic properties of landscapes using GIS technologies defined set of basic functions of the projected GIS. The first block of functions is designed for creation of the information basis for the study of the aesthetic value of landscapes. The second block includes functions of assessing the aesthetic value. Depending on the available data, user will be able to choose or independently form an evaluation scale from individual parameters, set evaluation methods and thresholds for each parameter. If the method of evaluation is chosen on the basis of polling data, the system will support the access of experts to the questionnaire and materials for evaluation, as well as the collection and analysis of survey data. Finally, the visualization block will provide a function of visual display of the assessment results, localized in points or in areas.

The developed GIS will be able to provide geographic information support at all stages of the study—from the input of the base layers and the selection of control points to the visualization of results.

Keywords

aesthetic value, aesthetic appeal, GIS, landscape, GIS support.

References

  1. Bibaeva A.Yu., Makarov A.A. Using GIS to calculate complex indices of aesthetic assessment of landscapes. Proceedings of the Irkutsk state University. Earth Science series, 2018. V. 24. P. 17–33. DOI: 10.26516/2073-3402.2018.24.17 (in Russian).
  2. Dirin D.A. Approaches to the evaluation of aesthetic resources of mountain landscapes (on the example of the river basin Multi). Polzunovsky Bulletin, 2004. No 2. P. 67–75 (in Russian).
  3. Dirin D.A., Popov. E.S. Assessment of landscape and aesthetic attractiveness of landscapes: methodological review. News of the Altai state University, 2010. No 3. P. 120–124 (in Russian).
  4. Figueroa Alfaro R.W., Tang Zh. Evaluating the aesthetic value of cultural ecosystem services by mapping geo-tagged photographs from social media data on Panoramio and Flickr. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2017. V. 60. Iss. 2. P. 266–281. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1151772.
  5. Fourie R. Applying GIS in the evaluation of landscape aesthetics. Thesis. Master of arts (Geography and Environmental Studies). Stellenbosch, 2005. 70 p.
  6. Frank S., Fürstb C., Koschkea L., Witta A., Makeschin F. Assessment of landscape aesthetics—Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecological Indicators, 2013. V. 32. P. 222–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026.
  7. García-Palomares J.C., Gutiérrez J., Mínguez C. Identification of tourist hot spots based on social networks: a comparative analysis of European metropolises using photosharing services and GIS. Applied Geography, 2015. V. 63. P. 408–417.
  8. Garms E.O., Khromikh V.V., Sukhova M.G. The use of GIS in the assessment of geomorphological resources for recreation (on the example of the transboundary Altai mountains). Modern problems of science and education, 2013. No 6. Web resource: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=11209 (accessed 28.02.2019) (in Russian).
  9. Gorbunova T.Yu., Gorbunov R.V., Cluckina A.A. Assessment of landscape and aesthetic value of landscapes of South-Eastern Crimea. Scientific notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Geography. Geology, 2017. V. 3 (69), No 3–2. P. 237–249 (in Russian).
  10. Gribok M.V. On the possibility of using data on geolocated photos in the research of tourist attractiveness of roadside landscapes (exemplified by the Chuya highway). InterCarto. InterGIS. Proceedings of the International сonference. Petrozavodsk: KRC RAS, 2018. V. 24. Part 1. P. 588–595. DOI: 10.24057/2414-9179-2018-1-24-588-595 (in Russian, abs English).
  11. Kochurov B.I., Buchatskaya N.V. Assessment of aesthetic potential of the landscape. South of Russia: ecology, development, 2007. V. 2. No 4. P. 25–34. DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2007-4-25-34 (in Russian).
  12. Kolbovsky E.Yu. Aesthetic evaluation of landscapes: issues of methodology. Yaroslavl pedagogical Bulletin, 2011. No 4. V. 3 (Natural Sciences). P. 161–166. (in Russian).
  13. Modern landscapes of the Crimea and adjacent waters. Ed. by E.A. Pozachenyuk. Simferopol: Business-Inform, 2009. 672 p. (in Russian).
  14. Othman J. Assessing scenic beauty of nature-based landscapes of Fraser’s Hill. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2015. 30. P. 115–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.020.
  15. Pavlova A.Yu., Cherkashin A.K. System-geoinformation analysis of the aesthetic image of the landscape (on the example of lake Baikal). Information and mathematical technologies in science and management: Proceedings of the XIV Baikal All-Russian Conf. Irkutsk: Institute of Energy Systems named after L.A. Melentyev SB RAS, 2009. V. 2. P. 52–63 (in Russian).
  16. Roth M., Gruehn D. Visual landscape assessment for large areas—using GIS, internet surveys and statistical methodologies in participatory landscape planning or the federal state of mecklenburg-western Pomerania, Germany. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, Section A: Human and Social Sciences, 2012. P. 129–142.
  17. Sarancha M.A. Visual and aesthetic value of Udmurtia landscapes: assessment using GIS. Geographical Bulletin, 2010. No 2. P. 24–28 (in Russian).
  18. Vargues P., Loures L. Using Geographic Information Systems in Visual and Aesthetic Analysis: the case study of a golf course in Algarve. Wseas transactions on environment and development, 2008. Iss. 9. V. 4. P. 774–783.
  19. Ward K., Snoberger N. Assessment of landscape scenic quality in the Angelina National Forest, Texas using GIS and high-resolution digital imagery. San Antonio 2009 ASPRS-MAPPS Fall Conference Proceedings, 2009. Web resource: https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/up-loads/2010/12/Ward.pdf (accessed 18.02.2019).
  20. Wu Y., Bishop I., Hossain H., Sposito V. Using GIS in landscape visual quality assessment. Applied GIS, 2006. V. 2. No 3. P. 18.1–18.20.

For citation: Gribok M.V., Gorbunova T.Yu. Development of the concept of GIS for research of the aesthetic value of natural landscapes Proceedings of the International conference “InterCarto. InterGIS”. 2019;25(2):321–329 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2019-2-25-321-329